Re: Larry Williams Commercial Proxy Index

43
ixion700 wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 6:23 am Hello dear coders @mrtools, @kvak. If it is possible could you guys give us the option to choose adaptive ATR please? I'm very curios to see if that Efficiency Ratio of Kaufman improves LWPI. Many thanks in forward.
I made some version of this indicator and trying testing replace otiginal ATR with others calculations. But not posted it. Here is one tested version.
These users thanked the author kvak for the post (total 4):
RodrigoRT7, ixion700, 太虚一毫, Jimmy

Re: Larry Williams Commercial Proxy Index

44
kvak wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 6:40 am I made some version of this indicator and trying testing replace otiginal ATR with others calculations. But not posted it. Here is one tested version.
Compared all the modes available in "Calculate on?" option. Seems the ATR is still the best choice. Also that "Type of calculation" I suggested earlier isn't important, better to be removed. Regards.
Think out of the box!

Re: Larry Williams Commercial Proxy Index

45
kvak wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 6:40 am I made some version of this indicator and trying testing replace otiginal ATR with others calculations. But not posted it. Here is one tested version.
you should include the Ultimate Volatility Indicator in your indis. it has all the best volatility measurements (Adaptive ATR, ADR, Volatility Estimators, GARCH, etc)
Jeff
These users thanked the author ionone for the post:
RodrigoRT7
Scalping the Century TimeFrame since 1999


Re: Larry Williams Commercial Proxy Index

48
kvak wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2024 6:40 am I made some version of this indicator and trying testing replace otiginal ATR with others calculations. But not posted it. Here is one tested version.
Hi Kvak!! all good? another great indicator of confirmation that it is on my radar.

I tried to use what you left as a test, but in MTF it ends up unconfiguring.

Could you update the averages+ RMAs in the "calculation Ma type" part at least? in either of the two indicators it would be excellent :D

because I imagine that it is not possible to include Avgs in all the average functions available in the indicator.

Thank you very much in advance :D

Re: Larry Williams Commercial Proxy Index

49
RodrigoRT7 wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 2:25 pm Hi Kvak!! all good? another great indicator of confirmation that it is on my radar.

I tried to use what you left as a test, but in MTF it ends up unconfiguring.

Could you update the averages+ RMAs in the "calculation Ma type" part at least? in either of the two indicators it would be excellent :D

because I imagine that it is not possible to include Avgs in all the average functions available in the indicator.

Thank you very much in advance :D
Hello.
How are you bro?
Here is first indicator updated with RMA's.
These users thanked the author kvak for the post:
RodrigoRT7

Re: Larry Williams Commercial Proxy Index

50
RodrigoRT7 wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 2:25 pm Hi Kvak!! all good? another great indicator of confirmation that it is on my radar.

I tried to use what you left as a test, but in MTF it ends up unconfiguring.

Could you update the averages+ RMAs in the "calculation Ma type" part at least? in either of the two indicators it would be excellent :D

because I imagine that it is not possible to include Avgs in all the average functions available in the indicator.

Thank you very much in advance :D
And here is second indicator updated with RMA's.
Also corrected my bug in MTF, sorry for that and thank for watching this....
These users thanked the author kvak for the post (total 2):
RodrigoRT7, Krunal Gajjar