Re: Various (Specialist) indicators for MT4

1622
ujtrader wrote: Sun Feb 15, 2026 1:25 pm First, no offense intended to you personally. I understand you are just sharing the indicator and not the developer. My comment was about the technical risk model of DLL-based indicators in general, not about this specific tool or you.

When an MT4 indicator loads an external DLL, it is no longer just an indicator.
It becomes native Windows software with the same privileges as your user account.

When an indicator imports DLLs like kernel32.dll, user32.dll, ws2_32.dll, advapi32.dll, or ntdll.dll, it is calling native Windows API functions directly, bypassing MetaTrader’s internal security restrictions.

This means:

kernel32.dll and ntdll.dll allow low-level OS operations (memory, processes, file access).

user32.dll can interact with keyboard, mouse, and windows.

ws2_32.dll allows raw network communication (sending data to external servers).

advapi32.dll can access Windows registry and security APIs.

These libraries are not needed for a simple oscillator indicator, which can be coded fully in MQL4 without any external dependencies. That is why I said it is unnecessary for such a simple tool.

DLLs are often used for licensing, GUIs, neural networks, or high-performance calculations. But they increase the attack surface and reduce transparency, especially when the source code is not provided.

Evidence is not about this specific indicator being malicious it's about the documented capabilities of Windows APIs. Microsoft’s official documentation clearly shows what these DLLs can do. MT4 simply exposes those functions when “Allow DLL imports” is enabled.

So my point is not that this indicator is malware. My point is:
From a security and risk-management perspective, I personally prefer not to run system-level DLL code for a simple indicator when it can be done in pure MQL4.

Everyone has different risk tolerance. I prefer minimal dependencies.

Lastly, I’m sorry if this sounded personal my intention is purely technical and about security, not about anyone here.

Thank you for your explanation and elaboration.

I have much understand about the Windows Operating System work's.

This has given me the New insights and a Deeper understanding of the Relationship between Scripts for MetaQuotes Terminal and OS Windows.

Once again... Thank you very much.
These users thanked the author Tsar for the post (total 2):
ujtrader, ashdays
Always looking the GREAT, never left GOOD Point...

Re: Various (Specialist) indicators for MT4

1623
Tsar wrote: Sun Feb 15, 2026 9:09 pm Thank you for your explanation and elaboration.

I have much understand about the Windows Operating System work's.

This has given me the New insights and a Deeper understanding of the Relationship between Scripts for MetaQuotes Terminal and OS Windows.

Once again... Thank you very much.
you are doing Nice work, thanks for sharing. I’m using a few of your shared indicators already. Keep it up bro 👍
These users thanked the author ujtrader for the post (total 2):
Tsar, ashdays
Don't fight the market let it reveal its tricks, then strike with precision. 💪🥊

Re: Various (Specialist) indicators for MT4

1624
kvak wrote: Mon Oct 06, 2025 6:42 am Hello my friend, here is new version of Z- score.
New menu for type calculation : original or use CC.
Added Pre-po smoothing, filtering.
Note, some of average are not able to use for po-smoothing. It have hard coded price in its calculations ( like Kijun, Halftrend sma....)
Hi kvak! How are you? Since your media kit has improved so much, could you update the media for my beloved Z Score?

I noticed that Hann and Savitzky-Golay are in your kit :D

Thank you very much in advance!
These users thanked the author RodrigoRT7 for the post:
kvak

Re: Various (Specialist) indicators for MT4

1625
RodrigoRT7 wrote: Thu Feb 26, 2026 4:16 pm Hi kvak! How are you? Since your media kit has improved so much, could you update the media for my beloved Z Score?

I noticed that Hann and Savitzky-Golay are in your kit :D

Thank you very much in advance!
Hello my friend, here is updated version.
These users thanked the author kvak for the post (total 3):
RodrigoRT7, Krunal Gajjar, FredericoA