Darkdoji wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2023 3:42 am Please let me know this. Looking at the H4 window does the point to point moves there not tell the whole STORY of the Gold market to the point we are? Did the Screenface not therefore give us the correct contexts to judge our trade actions to this point? I would like views please if people have been watching even if not trading the TOOL yet. Thanks

The Crow (-_-)

Does this mean that because we have a global M(5) low on the H4 but no gold low, price should go higher to "repaint" the recent G(4) high to a M(5) high?

ForexFux wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2023 7:44 am Does this mean that because we have a global M(5) low on the H4 but no gold low, price should go higher to "repaint" the recent G(4) high to a M(5) high?

Not sure where you are reading from and confused therefore as to your meaning. To sort that out let me say as below:

a) In general we track price by H4 (6n) Point to Point Crown heads and that is say a move = H4 Crown ----> H4 Crown.

b) You have only 3 types of Crown heads and they are differentiated by Colour = A (3) Aqua, G (4) Gold and M (5) Magenta and their seniority increases from left to right.

c) While b is true it is also true that between any 2 Crown head that define a complete H4 move we have intermediate Semaphore heads in the same trajectory that also behave similarly (point to point), and these we call whiteheads and blackheads which define or mark FLE fluctuations.

d) Currently on H4 we have a move defined by a Crown head low and a Crown head high of the lowest Crown rank which is an A (3) or Aqua. Between them you can see clusters of blackheads and whiteheads defining FLE fluctuations. And Exactly now now we are in FLE fluctuating to rise or fall and as you can see from the screenshot we have 3 whiteheads defining the moves so far from yesterday and today.

So what are you describing as I do not understand where you are reading from. The description you have does not fit the screenshot we have here so can you kindly refit your thinking and re-express your point please so we are on the same page. Thanks

(-_-)

Darkdoji wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2023 3:20 am @ImpLaNT again top marks for your anticipation of this event. Your earlier remarks as to this possibility made me more careful to read space and decide what I wanted to do. A good example of the need for an informed community working the market together. Cheers

(-_-)

Yesterday I sold gold, again I am trading the pullback without risk-free coverage...
Sorry, after opening it I went straight to bed, so I’m only posting it now. It looks like the bottom of the near space has been reached (n-2n) KSO in the bottom line, but for the target I’m looking at 1980 for now, maybe I’ll have to adjust it, who knows...

ImpLaNT wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2023 8:38 am Yesterday I sold gold, again I am trading the pullback without risk-free coverage...
Sorry, after opening it I went straight to bed, so I’m only posting it now. It looks like the bottom of the near space has been reached (n-2n) KSO in the bottom line, but for the target I’m looking at 1980 for now, maybe I’ll have to adjust it, who knows...

The most basic sign of an end for me would be a nSign on (green or pullback -----> to Gold or breakout). My estimate of the H4 stop was 1986 which has been more or less reached (1980 seems a lot given CMD1 however not saying it is not possible). But to be safe and not to assume I would trade up risk-free side on a change in nSign for a new trade up. Tomorrow is Thanks giving for our friends in the USA I think. Is Gold trading or is the market closed for Tomorrow? Then I notice your wins have been serial and yes you may have stayed out of the market sometimes but so far you not lost a trade in your latest series of trades and if that is correct looks great to me. I mean 100/100 times does not mean taking every trade but winning every trade you do take.

(-_-)

On H4, in the long term, this variant may work.... But for now these are just assumptions...
Strange attractor on the market price is the three-leg pendulum....(by mr. Doji theory)

I was forced down memory lane today looking for something I wrote before and in the early days of this thread for my current article and thus found myself reviewing the "past." Bringing back to mind things no longer in focus but also members and their comments and all the exchanges made then as well as some facts I now find interesting. For instance,

a) @ImpLaNT was my chief antagonist but now a very good friend and an expert Orbit trader.
b) @Davie 111 has always been around and from the start was very, very positive and remains so.
c) Interesting disputations with @Xard777 who is always here now (day and night) but silent.
d) Many that showed initial interest but no longer come around at all.
e) People that were very helpful but I no longer see such as @Khan and @Manu9710

And it hit me how tough it has been. So has it been worth it for me? I am not sure it has. And from all of that and more knowing what I know now of this path would I have come here with Orbit? No I would not have at all it has been unfair and I would not have wanted the silly aggravations suffered for no justifiable reason other than that I wanted to share something I thought useful to all traders. Have I enjoyed the experience? Not at all and should actually regret it were it not people like @Khan, @Davie 111, @Manu9710, @Italian Trader and several others who showed determination and positive commitment to learning something different that I had an interest in sharing. Would I encourage someone else with something new and interesting to come around? No I would not it is not worth it as there are too many negative people here that are not worth anyone's time least of all someone out to persuade others on a new vision. But what about the positive people in their midst? That is the pity those are dominated by the ignorant, selfish and nasty and I would argue that there may be many others with goods to share but that have been kept away by these nasty and discredited people and therefore to the loss of the positive people on this site. So what do I think is a solution? Not sure there is one given it is a public and open forum. But one thing that heartened me and could be helpful was the open outcry by the positive minds on this thread when it was recently swarmed by goons out simply to shut the thread down for no just cause. The positives reacted very strongly to send them away for good and to my mind that is a right approach because the negatives deny not just the messengers space but also the potential beneficiaries important content and clearly everyone is justified in defending their interest. But in all of this a single post kept me going even back then and I will never forget the post and remain grateful for it (there were others but this stands out) and it is this post below:

a-new-trading-game-chaos-game-played-fo ... 1295502759

May God be with the poster.

(-_-)

PS: A truth of life affirmed by all of this is that if you are not I am not and if I am not you are not ------------> no one is more important than another and we can only be important as a group.

Darkdoji wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2023 8:23 am Not sure where you are reading from and confused therefore as to your meaning. To sort that out let me say as below:

a) In general we track price by H4 (6n) Point to Point Crown heads and that is say a move = H4 Crown ----> H4 Crown.

b) You have only 3 types of Crown heads and they are differentiated by Colour = A (3) Aqua, G (4) Gold and M (5) Magenta and their seniority increases from left to right.

c) While b is true it is also true that between any 2 Crown head that define a complete H4 move we have intermediate Semaphore heads in the same trajectory that also behave similarly (point to point), and these we call whiteheads and blackheads which define or mark FLE fluctuations.

d) Currently on H4 we have a move defined by a Crown head low and a Crown head high of the lowest Crown rank which is an A (3) or Aqua. Between them you can see clusters of blackheads and whiteheads defining FLE fluctuations. And Exactly now now we are in FLE fluctuating to rise or fall and as you can see from the screenshot we have 3 whiteheads defining the moves so far from yesterday and today.

So what are you describing as I do not understand where you are reading from. The description you have does not fit the screenshot we have here so can you kindly refit your thinking and re-express your point please so we are on the same page. Thanks

(-_-)

Thx for your answer.

I'm aware of the things you have explained, the only problem is I don't know which chart I have analyzed instead, and It wasn't definitely not gold. Damn I'm getting dementia. Sry for the confusion.

I think I know now what I did. I was analyzing the 30m gold chart not the 4h.

I have posted my comment when price was somewhere in the red cycle on the attached screenshot. Also, where now a M(5) crown head is was a G(4) head before when I wrote my post.

Here is what I wrote:

Does this mean that because we have a global M(5) low on the H4 but no gold low, price should go higher to "repaint" the recent G(4) high to a M(5) high?

replace H4 with M30.

I thought price has to go higher in order to let the semafor print a new M(5) high to match the M(5) low. Remember, the exact same high at this time showed only a G(4) high crown. What I find strange is that price went lower and changed the g(4) high to a m(5) high. I hope you know what I mean.

Just to let you know it is coming on really well what I am writing. For those truly following to know and to benefit their trading, you will know everything that I know and see everything that I see I promise that. For what I know about trading is incontrovertible and as yet uncontroverted. This time it will be different and MUST be so because I must Rest In Peace. Hopefully by the weekend I will be ready and thank you for your trust and patience.

(_-_) Angry - Very Angry

And it will pay all those who understand and abide by the revelations ----> to the end of their trading. Of that I am certain.

ForexFux wrote: Fri Nov 24, 2023 2:44 am I think I know now what I did. I was analyzing the 30m gold chart not the 4h.

I have posted my comment when price was somewhere in the red cycle on the attached screenshot. Also, where now a M(5) crown head is was a G(4) head before when I wrote my post.

Here is what I wrote:

Does this mean that because we have a global M(5) low on the H4 but no gold low, price should go higher to "repaint" the recent G(4) high to a M(5) high?

replace H4 with M30.

I thought price has to go higher in order to let the semafor print a new M(5) high to match the M(5) low. Remember, the exact same high at this time showed only a G(4) high crown. What I find strange is that price went lower and changed the g(4) high to a m(5) high. I hope you know what I mean.

I will respond just give me a little time or if someone can respond please do. Cheers

(-_-)