Darkdoji wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2023 10:06 pmThat is fairly defective reasoning on your part.
Quite the contrary is true and you know it. You are just too EGOCENTRIC (not to mention totally full of shit) to admit the SIIIIIIIMPLE truth that if you have a way of determining RIIIIIISK FREEEEEEE market space, then you possess the Holy Grail and the ability to make a fortune from every single trade. If you can make a fortune from every single trade then you do not need investors to fund your baffling bullshit 'cloud' vision or anything else for that matter. You could literally become the richest human being on Earth. The fact that you HAVEN'T done so and instead spend every waking minute on this forum trying to indoctrinate the masses with War & Peace sized comments that contain nothing more than pretentious gibberish, speaks volumes.
Do you know how to shut me and every other detractor up and convert us overnight? Open a private Skype/Zoom/Discord/Telegram room and for ONE WEEK allow a handful of us in while you GUIDE us step by step through your thinking process while we observe Orbit with you in real time. Explain your theories as they unfold in front of our eyes. Allow all us dumb folk to ask you questions and answer them in as PLAIN LANGUAGE as you can muster. It is SIIIIIMPLE after all, right?
RIIIIGHT? Show us the trades as you enter them and enlighten us as to your ineffable brilliance. Once you have shown beyond all doubt that you are a mathematical and trading prodigy - even if we don't quite grok every last nuance - then even the cynics like me will be the first to congratulate you, recant every nasty thing we've said about you and forever be in your debt. I will make it my mission to take on @Implant's former role and jump to your defence at the slightest hint of anyone's scepticism. Why wouldn't I? I'd be the luckiest person on the planet for having met you and as at heart I am a decent man I'd want to make sure that other people didn't doubt you as I once had.
But here's the thing...
You're not going to do that, are you? You'll either ignore this post completely (as you did with my previous one) or come up with an excuse or twist my SIMPLE words in a way that you can slither out of it. Unlike Orbit, I am 100/100 certain you won't entertain the idea.
Prove me wrong. Do it! I'm a masochist and want everyone to laugh at me for how stupid I was. I'll even
PAY you IF you can definitively PROVE your contentions in real time and I mean this categorically. Send me a legal NDA and I'll sign it. In order for me to 'pay up' though, it would have to be fair and all other private group members who were granted access alongside me would have to UNANIMOUSLY agree that you had sufficiently proven your points and I was mistaken. For you see, I actually AM a professional trader. I do it for a living and HAVE made some decent money from trading over the years. I'm not uber-rich nor do I claim to be all knowing, but unlike you, I don't play with micro-lots either. I have been trading economic news lucratively for the better part of two decades and if not for the world going nuts in 2020 and thereby (obliquely) putting the scupper to a great degree on my earnings then I wouldn't be wasting my time on forums such as these reading about would-be Supermen and their delusions. I've issued you a challenge here in front of the world, so let's see what you've got. Besides, don't you WAAAAAANT to indisputably prove the efficacy of Orbit? Otherwise what is the point of all of this? It's not... it's not.... it's not.... it's not just silly posturing, is it? I'd hate to think this was all because you're starved for attention. That would just be sad.
I should leave the post at this point, but I too suffer from verbal (and written) diarrhoea, so let me continue with my rebuttal of your pathetic response to @Josi.
You said this:
Darkdoji wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2023 10:06 pmWhat you can do to have any credibility at all in this matter (rather than try to twist things on issues you do not have an iota of understanding about), is to prove the claim wrong just a single time.
Once again, the irony is astounding. @Josi has to prove NOTHING.
YOOOOOU are the one making the claim that you have a tool which can account for how the market works.
YOOOOOU are the one making the claim that you have a tool which can provide 100 out of 100 RISK FREE trades.
YOOOOOU are the one making the claim that it is SIMPLE.
Therefore the onus and burden of proof falls to YOOOOOU to make good on your claims. Do you understand this?
Yes, we may indeed all be too dumb to comprehend 'your truth', but the fault would still be yours for falsely claiming it's simple.
So you see, in the final analysis, no matter how much you shout and bawl and slither and crawl, all responsibility is YOURS, not ours.
If you do not make good on my challenge then I won't be back. Unlike you, my time really is precious to me and I've got better things to do than to provide fuel for silly dreamers whose ego-to-lot-size ratio is incredibly skewed in favour of the former.