When you use Trade Control visually observe the chaos from the fractal geometry that you can see with your eyes. See for example that when we have a point match (Trade Control point = 6n point), the first indication of a stop is not some indicator, it is the behaviour of price itself. You will observe that the matched point fractures (breaks up) and begins to redefine a pattern of inverse structure. Very interesting and if you keep an eye on Orbit Screenface soon (with some lag) you see yourself that you have a stop and start thinking what next? Which leads you to prepare for a trade of course after checking the location of price on the Strange Attractor, etc. The second important point about trade control fluctuations is the fluctuations relative to volatility bands provided. It is also visually interesting. But what is going on there? Why do we see this every time price is folding in FLE? Obviously it appears to be some kind of process ---> Yes it is a pattern of play where the mathematics says that there must be topological invariance between 2 spaces for the variable to translate from one to the other (think of homogeneity existing in the different spaces in the sense of the two becoming one). This is a dependency related to some timing mechanism as in chaos theory the selection of the initial valued sequence is not a random event. But the main point is this, watching the play and the breaking into and out of near space and far space as represented by price action and volatility band action while watching the registers on Screenface soon teaches the trader to time correctly and intuitively almost to the dot when price is ready to translate between two spaces near space and far space without the need for indicators. Orbit is not indicator driven it follows a bijective or homoeomorphic pattern. Indicators used merely help us to visualize what is going on and therefore what it means to us trading. But the price action itself is beyond the simplicity of indicators and rooted in the deterministic pattern of chaos. The moral is do not just focus on winning trades get engaged in timing them by observing for yourself the points made above. When something is visual you can use your language to describe what you see and do not need to bother about the math beyond the understanding that the math comprehends such price behaviour as you witness exactly. So you can trust Orbit signaling and of course soon your own head and eyes ----> everyone in the end has enough mathematics in him to be a chaotist just from observing fluctuations you start to see their fractal properties.
(-_-)
PS: The simplest colloquial sense of understanding my points about topological invariance is that even when price has hit a high it does just start to fall because it hit a high. It follows a pattern that determines its next direction. The same for a low. So for instance Gold right now is in that situation and that is what you see in the holding pattern now reflected in Trade Control play. Observe that because of this and so far there is no significant change in screenface and the previous pattern remains as before so you cannot say we have a high to trade until there is topological invariance between the high point and its path through some low space on the attractor. Hope this helps.
Re: A New Trading Game (chaos game) Played for Money and Played in Risk- Free Space
1851- These users thanked the author Darkdoji for the post (total 4):
- Dave111, ForexFux, RollerAndTrading, Mundu19