By what if analysis I mean looking at each emergent attractors in the named partitions relative to the mother attractor in 9n and considering trajectories. For instance, 9n W1 at low implies a rise to 9n W1 high and you can visualize the effect on the fractures to the left of 9n. But that point is still motile and one has to wonder at this point about where it will stop. Will it displace 1888 if so what are the implications, etc. A pivot is NOT a stop until it is no longer motile and the sign changes behind it then we can recalculate the market.

(-_-)

PS: I hope people can see that the way amplitude seeking indicators work reflect how price moves and if there is anything to blame for so-called "repainting" of which amplitude seeking indicators are wrongly accused --------> IT IS PRICE. Most people cannot handle the truth which is simply that nothing known to man predicts price, now or forever. It is not a question of the measurement instrument used now or what might come as "improved" technology in the future. It is a question of the pattern of fluctuation. It is a question of chaos. Finally, what do we see from the nested attractors that says time frames are different? I see nothing. Direction is driven by current inputs (intraday cycle) not dead bars from history.

All the information we need on the flow are on Screenface and this from the mother attractor ----->n, at all times . The Ordinals show per key attractor the active pivot driving flow and whether or not its elements are cohesive (single pointed arrow) or are in correction (double arrows showing bias of corrective flow). Which partitions are actively contributing to the movement (Fractal Pattern) and the strength of the flow per term (Price Action Arrows), Market objective (Spike Event), etc, etc. They are designed to inform your responses intuitively. The elements of Screenface communicate the inductive pattern (step by step formation of move) and the fact that at all times price is cyclical (moves up and down going up or down). I sincerely believe that enough has been said for any trader at all to understand and trade by the level 1 and 2 commands. I do not see what else I can say to make you see that Orbit captures flow information to the last dot and that it is just a question of trusting the pattern and taking trades at the right pivot and timing given the level 1 and 2 commands in force. A question of trust based on the logic or experience but alternatively and preferably both. It is NOT about me showing how I trade or when I make entries --------------> everyone has their own timing but must be based on the correct reading of the command structure which is probably the clearest and most simple entry key EVER (if not why not?). People will not try even on demo to see. This is so clear in terms of the logic and information we all have that I will trade and show only when I want to make a particular point. I know as a trader that when I get a particular tool I take it apart and put it together myself. I then form an idea of how I want to use it and next I try to see if it works that way or not. I do not wait for who created the fascinating RSi to show me how to use it before I use it. I show myself. It is my money and my life and I will find out myself regardless of what anyone including the maker says ---------> I am the trader it has to work for me to make sense.

(-_-)

From our previous discussions, it seems more beneficial to configure the screen with a primary window that displays the full interface. Additionally, higher TF windows can display semaphores without the complete interface. If I eliminate the 'Orbit The Tool - Base' indicator and the EA 'Orbit The Tool - Seal3', leaving only the semaphore window (as shown in the smaller windows below), will this disrupt other indicators due to potential data dependencies?

solarian wrote: Thu Sep 28, 2023 12:56 am From our previous discussions, it seems more beneficial to configure the screen with a primary window that displays the full interface. Additionally, higher TF windows can display semaphores without the complete interface. If I eliminate the 'Orbit The Tool - Base' indicator and the EA 'Orbit The Tool - Seal3', leaving only the semaphore window (as shown in the smaller windows below), will this disrupt other indicators due to potential data dependencies?

No -----> one can make templates off of the mother template that do NOT include Orbit just the Semaphores, zigzags and of course the incredibly useful MRI tool. No reason why not as I do exactly that. Gives you a stronger sense of what is going on. I do not care so much for the higher time frames in my case but I must know what M1 and M5 are saying. They define for me earliest the market ahead and justify the pivoting. But of course that is me and what I want to know. Cheers

(-_-)

PS: Split screens and multiple windows are very useful with Orbit indeed.

Darkdoji wrote: Thu Sep 28, 2023 1:11 am No -----> one can make templates off of the mother template that do NOT include Orbit just the Semaphores, zigzags and of course the incredibly useful MRI tool. No reason why not as I do exactly that. Gives you a stronger sense of what is going on. I do not care so much for the higher time frames in my case but I must know what M1 and M5 are saying. They define for me earliest the market ahead and justify the pivoting. But of course that is me and what I want to know. Cheers

(-_-)

PS: Split screens and multiple windows are very useful with Orbit indeed.

Hello, dear professor. Orbit once again proved to be wonderful today.

Darkdoji wrote: Thu Sep 28, 2023 1:11 am No -----> one can make templates off of the mother template that do NOT include Orbit just the Semaphores, zigzags and of course the incredibly useful MRI tool. No reason why not as I do exactly that. Gives you a stronger sense of what is going on. I do not care so much for the higher time frames in my case but I must know what M1 and M5 are saying. They define for me earliest the market ahead and justify the pivoting. But of course that is me and what I want to know. Cheers

(-_-)

PS: Split screens and multiple windows are very useful with Orbit indeed.

In the version that I use today, the semaphores are this color. Do you know where the problem comes from?

hesam-moon wrote: Thu Sep 28, 2023 3:57 am In the version that I use today, the semaphores are this color. Do you know where the problem comes from?

I do not know really. Get the latest version and it is a package with template etc and correct this. Not sure where it is now but cannot be beyond page 139.

(-_-)

hesam-moon wrote: Thu Sep 28, 2023 3:54 am Hello, dear professor. Orbit once again proved to be wonderful today.The market was wonderful Orbit just did what it does everyday ------------> follow correctly.

The market was wonderful Orbit just did what it does everyday ------------> follow correctly. Glad it helped and you were clearly able to follow correctly. Cheers

Below a version.

(-_-)

PS: Let me know how it looks and fits. Also the heavens opened up. This is a downpour from the mother attractor as you can see elsewhere.

I promised to show a version that will display how the equation works. I am waiting to show an inception, that is to say a pullback/reversal or a pullback/continuation. So next time we show something else. We appear to be at some extreme range of the current flow. If price is turning it will still persist with bijective ups and downs , usually whiteheads to keep nudging lower and lower to Initial Value. So watching that behavior waiting for a turn. However, by implication I think we have FLE fluctuations but one directly involving the mother attractor. So I could be wrong about exact values (pip distances but may be not so about the structure). This is not a topology that is easy to trade ----> I call it a zone of hostility -------> Intermittency -------> Chaos. That is if I am right (you are free to read it your own way and only experience can teach us both not me). Whatever the case Point to Point in risk free space keeps you safe (whatever the outcome think about that), for instance I could be wrong and Gold drops another ton. I am just saying take care (it is pivot to pivot in this topology), and it is Pi (for pivot) + Inverse On + Sign+ even more than that but everything breaks down to {Pi +Level command)1/ Level 2} = Trigger. If you can do that you should win the trades you take. That is what Orbit did at pivot. Of course turns will feel uncertain but you know it is chaos and will persist in the end in following the sign. It just takes time, time that tests your discipline as a trader (its pattern to infinity is fold and stretch which affect what we see and feel). Price defeats the mind not the intellect chaos is beyond the intellect. It shows that indeed all men are equal. Who dares wins. But then there is a sure tool that will do that correctly every time and it is not so fast doing so you cannot follow.

100 (_-_) 100

PS: It does not say you will not lose it says you can learn to trade to approximate Orbit the Tool and thereby work your strategy that will give you 100/100 yourself. Copy trade Orbit and see what happens.

Was tight for me and so got in a bit late keeping in mind we have well exceeded Intraday extremes (MRI) and in the lower end of D1 (MRI). Only problem now is to watch closely to manage take profit.

(-_-)

What did I do to enter? What I said just above.