regit wrote: Mon May 08, 2023 3:48 am Sorry, but finding the controlling TF is not related to Orbit the Tool, so I won't be discussing it here.

I´m impressed with you results too, let's start a new topic to talk about pleaseeeeee =)

RollerAndTrading wrote: Mon May 08, 2023 1:19 pm I´m impressed with you results too, let's start a new topic to talk about pleaseeeeee =)

Where are your posts in this thread about Orbit? Have you tried following the M30 and looking for a 2Y black arrrow to draw, then checking the n Cyclicality to change color (to match the direction of the black arrow) for an entry?

regit wrote: Tue May 09, 2023 1:07 am Where are your posts in this thread about Orbit? Have you tried following the M30 and looking for a 2Y black arrrow to draw, then checking the n Cyclicality to change color (to match the direction of the black arrow) for an entry?

i do some posts back, on this weekend i read last few pages of topic but don´t tried this approach, i will try on this week. tks for you response, if possible share a capture please.

i´m grateful and believe on Orbit, but don´t have best results on my trader.

Someone here use Orbit to trade US30 or NAS100 ?

RollerAndTrading wrote: Tue May 09, 2023 1:32 am i do some posts back, on this weekend i read last few pages of topic but don´t tried this approach, i will try on this week. tks for you response, if possible share a capture please.

i´m grateful and believe on Orbit, but don´t have best results on my trader.

Someone here use Orbit to trade US30 or NAS100 ?

Same here, i tried with an indicator that takes screenshots each new bar, so at the end of the day i could watch the images and see if any signal would be profitable, but it looks pretty random to me.

For those that have read the entire thread, you might recall that there has been some posts about a 1-2-3 sequence that comprises a single larger semaphore. For example, on a specific timeframe, you see a 3A crown high drawn. EVENTUALLY, there will be a 3A crown low drawn. Between the 3A high and low we have an expectation that there will be 2Y black arrows that make a 1-2-3 sequence. However, in the real world, you will see anywhere from NO 2Y black arrows to some finite number of black arrows: You cannot know exactly how many black arrows WILL be drawn; you can only observe AFTER the 2nd 3A semaphore is drawn how many black arrows there are. (And THEN you can examine those black arrows and arrive at a 1-2-3 sequence that excludes the ones of lesser importance.)

So now you likely will say that watching for the black arrows after a 3A semaphore is of no practical value, because it is possible that there will be none at all, and it is possible that there will be 3, 5, 13, 21, whatever, before the 2nd 3A is drawn. However, you should actually observe on a selected TF the drawing of the black arrows and how they move their position. But for most people, this is not practical to do in real time. So it is recommended that you a use video recording application so that you can study how/when the semaphores are being drawn at a time that is convenient for you.

Darkdoji wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 5:19 pm 1.

2.
https://www.complexity explorables.org/flongs/

Samm,
At the start of the video, at the bottom left in the slide, you mention "Fractal Visions". You probably want to change that to something else, because currently, "FractalVisions" is "A supernatural group of artists . . ." that has NFT artwork for sale. That's hardly what Orbit is about.

ImpLaNT wrote: Thu May 04, 2023 11:17 am Dear Regit, you are not mistaken in anything ... With regards to fractals, it is actually always 1,2,3 - no matter what anyone says. I can continue these screenshots indefinitely and you will not see anything other than 0,1,2,3. It's an axiom!

Hi, thank you for sharing with the community.
Can you please share 123 count indicator ?

quangvuig wrote: Sat May 13, 2023 3:35 pm Hi, thank you for sharing with the community.
Can you please share 123 count indicator ?

Zigzags are built using the standard ZigZag indicator, which is part of MT4. Zigzags with a period of 55(yellow), 89(green), 144(aqua), 233(blue), 377(purple). The numbers 0,1,2,3 are written manually in the screenshots.

ImpLaNT wrote: Sat May 13, 2023 9:39 pm Zigzags are built using the standard ZigZag indicator, which is part of MT4. Zigzags with a period of 55(yellow), 89(green), 144(aqua), 233(blue), 377(purple). The numbers 0,1,2,3 are written manually in the screenshots.

thank you, can you share the document about 0.1,2,3 wave multiplexing. I practice combining waves like this

quangvuig wrote: Sun May 14, 2023 2:41 pm thank you, can you share the document about 0.1,2,3 wave multiplexing. I practice combining waves like this

Just a thought to consider . . .

You can see when a single larger weight zigzag line is drawn between 2 points that 1 OR MORE zigzags of smaller weight are drawn between the same 2 points. You can observe for yourself that there is not a fixed number of smaller zigags, but will be 1, 3, 5, ... So why are there not ALWAYS a fixed number of smaller zigzags, such as 3, that comprise the larger line? I postulate that there are indeed ALWAYS 3 smaller zigzags, IF you find the correct partition from which to view.

That is to say we have ARBITRARILY limited our "view ports" to the timeframes that MT4 provides, while the actual space can be viewed at ANY selected granularity, not just the granularity provided by the MT4 TFs. So, if you see a single larger zizgzag comprising 5 smaller zigzags, then change to a slightly larger TF that has slightly reduced granularity. You will find that there is a TF with granularity such that there are 3 zigzags that comprise a single larger zigzag on that TF.

Of course, in order to be able to find this "3-zigzag granularity" TF, you will need to have a charting platform that includes the ability to create any arbitrary TF that you want.

EDIT
Of course another option is to increase the value on the input of the smaller zigzag indicator until the 5 zigzags change to only 3.

Here is an example going the other direction. That is, when a 1-2-3 zigzag is expected but it is a single line instead. In this case, the input to the zigzag indicator is reduced to increase the view of granularity, until the 1-2-3 zigzag is found.
This is M15 . The 3Aqua is drawn as a single rising zizgzag, so where is the 2Yellow zigzag? It is also a single line that the 3Aqua has drawn on top of.
Here the input to the 2Y zigzag has been reduced until the 1-2-3 zigzag is displayed.