I am not very well and just chanced on this. There is a great deal of ignorance I have had to deal with lately and so far I usually like to be detailed so that there are no objective doubt left in the mind of the doubter that he is wrong. This is because once the premise of doubt is outside chaos theory and fractal geometry the ignorance becomes technical (mathematical). But not feeling well so let me just say this - Zigzag tools generate data as do Semaphore tools (which are amplitude seeking devices). When manipulated as sets of values in defined market topologies they cease to be "technical" anything. They become points we manipulate to generate information dynamically about the dynamics of the singularity or price. A whole range of mathematics go into what I have only described in outline. To see and know more about what we are really talking about (since the tools you talk about are not viewed in the same way as you might view them by us), please watch our video. We are not interested in your indicators or how you read them, our mathematics captures the topological information needed to read the dynamics of the singularity ONLY. I hope in some general sense I have communicated. But the issue is simple we do not use the same data in the same way or measure things as you would measure with the same data. Our worlds simply do not cross.xard777 wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 3:21 am Interesting... Uses 48,144, & 432 (x3) whereas I use 36, 144, 576 (x4)
The only indicators that I am familiar with that use recursive fractal geomerty are FRAMA and Hurst.
Xard777
Thank you,
(-_-)
PS: We read fractures we do not build them and we deal with multifractals not monofractals (for whatever that is worth). There is a difference so do not get confused to mix up one process for another. This is a different ball game altogether - this is not imaginary it is real. The markets are already chaotic systems underpinned by a fractal structure so our mathematics is different than the sort you cite since our purpose is different and nothing as artificial as you have in mind (something you should have thought about along with the other stuff on indicators, etc before feeling a need to fly your kite over this thread). Overall, not a very useful post at all from you, not even sure what your point is really just responded to correct obvious errors in logic and expression. Cheers