From Previous Video

“Who dont idolize dictators and bullies”

Gimme a break, media being puppeted for Joes undie

Starfish wrote: Thu Apr 04, 2024 3:07 am [M]edia being puppeted for Joes undie

Based on your posts and your signature, you seem to have a fetish.

JohnnyRy wrote: Thu Apr 04, 2024 3:39 am Based on your posts and your signature, you seem to have a fetish.

Shhhhh hes listening

Starfish wrote: Thu Apr 04, 2024 3:51 am Shhhhh hes listening

Don The Con's hyper-litigious DJT stockholders' mess proves that if you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas:

Judge's family get $10 million from Dems

Ogee wrote: Thu Apr 04, 2024 5:47 pm Judge's family get $10 million from Dems

That only amounts to a hill of beans. In the U.S., being related to a person who is politically opposed to a litigant does not disqualify a judge--because such a relationship is excluded by the relevant conflict-of-interest laws. If it were not excluded, most judges would be removed from all cases due to guilt-by-association. The U.S. Constitutional 1st Amendment not only protects speech, but also protects association.

It's rather interesting that Don The Con publicly pushes to "terminate the Consitution" as a wanna-be dictator, but supports the 1st Amendment only when it benefits him.

A U.S. Navy veteran reacts to Don The Con's campaign to become the first fascist dictator in U.S. history:

JohnnyRy wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2024 2:25 am That only amounts to a hill of beans. In the U.S., being related to a person who is politically opposed to a litigant does not disqualify a judge--because such a relationship is excluded by the relevant conflict-of-interest laws. If it were not excluded, most judges would be removed from all cases due to guilt-by-association. The U.S. Constitutional 1st Amendment not only protects speech, but also protects association.

It's rather interesting that Don The Con publicly pushes to "terminate the Consitution" as a wanna-be dictator, but supports the 1st Amendment only when it benefits him.

He never pushed to "terminate the Constitution"

Trump wrote:

So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great “Founders” did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!

Simple translation you won't hear from the biden regime-controlled news media, "is if the voting fraud stands then it all goes against the Constitution". Besides last I heard the left deems the Constitution "racist"!

mrtools wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2024 3:46 am Trump wrote:
... allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.

Don The Con's 62 frivolous lawsuits and appeals alleging election interference were dropped and/or dismissed, including affirmations of those dismissals in the U.S. Supreme Court (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-elec ... l_election). I should note that the U.S. Supreme Court was at that time, and continues to be, comprised of a majority of conservative Justices--3 of which were appointed by Don The Con himself.

So based on those real facts (not "alternative facts" that Trump and Fox News promote), there is absolutely nothing that allows for the termination of any rules, regulations, nor articles found in the Constitution. Therefore, the false premise that there was election interference means that Don The Con promotes destruction of the Constitution--which is perfectly aligned with his quest to become the first fascist dictator in the U.S.