JohnnyRy wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2024 2:25 am
That only amounts to a hill of beans. In the U.S., being related to a person who is politically opposed to a litigant does
not disqualify a judge--because such a relationship is
excluded by the relevant conflict-of-interest laws. If it were not excluded, most judges would be removed from all cases due to guilt-by-association. The U.S. Constitutional 1st Amendment not only protects speech, but also protects association.
It's rather interesting that Don The Con publicly pushes to "terminate the Consitution" as a wanna-be dictator, but supports the 1st Amendment only when it benefits him.
He never pushed to "terminate the Constitution"
Trump wrote:
So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great “Founders” did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!
Simple translation you won't hear from the biden regime-controlled news media, "is if the voting fraud stands then it all goes against the Constitution". Besides last I heard the left deems the Constitution "racist"!