Re: Technologies that officially "don't exist"

12
WOLF wrote: Wed May 15, 2024 11:39 am Being vaporized wouldnt be such a bad way to go huh? 🤷‍♂️
I think I'll leave the principle of MAD (mutually assured destruction) to the WWIII thread: post1295541540.html#p1295541540
WOLF wrote: Wed May 15, 2024 11:39 am That and the volcano of yellowstone park is on the west with all those nukes
Yeah, that could be part of the concern. No one wants 50 to 60 year-old missles that may have cracked solid rocket fuel sitting around like nuclear land mines.
“[A]s we know, there are known knowns—there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns—that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don’t know we don’t know.”—Donald Rumsfeld, 2002

Re: Technologies that officially "don't exist"

13
The U.K. and Israel appear to have land and ship based laser weapons too even though they "don't officially exist":

“[A]s we know, there are known knowns—there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns—that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don’t know we don’t know.”—Donald Rumsfeld, 2002


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests