New worries for Zelensky after the apparent loss of US intel, now there are questions about the future use of Starlink.
Trump did stop US intel being given to Ukraine before but just for a few days before things returned to normal, but now Ukraine’s use of Musk's internet system is also being questioned, the loss of which would be devastating for the Ukrainian war effort.
The concerns might have arisen because of Zelensky's plea to be allowed to use Starlink over Russia. This would coincide with Zelensky's claim to having a new ballistic missile capability arriving soon.
It is doubtful that Ukraine is able to produce ballistic missiles themselves and Europe is the more likely source.
The real problem is that Zelensky is completely demented and has no understanding of the serious danger of escalating when you don't have escalation dominance.
Zelensky has kept escalating throughout the conflict in the hope it would trigger the west to get directly involved but all that happened was Russia escalating in response making Ukraine suffer even more.
With Starlink over Russia and ballistic missiles Zelensky will fire them straight into Moscow (“to bring the war to the Russian people”) and damn the consequences.
And then the Russians, who do have escalation dominance, will respond, quite possibly with tactical nuclear weapons, why not?
The US would then be faced with a situation well beyond anyone's control.
And so if little Zelensky gets his hands on ballistic missiles there must be no chance of him using Starlink for targeting them. Ukraine commanders are already complaining that Starlink over Ukraine has started to be speed limited, as in degrading the ability to use their first person view cameras on their fast moving objects.
So far Ukraine’s targeting has been controlled by the CIA and the Europeans with their respective satellite data input, but given the rhetoric coming out of Europe lately the US should be cautious of them too.
Macgregor Tears Into NATO’s War Plan
Re: WW3 Countdown
2612
4 hours ago
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy
from 24.02.22 to 16.10.2026:
personnel – approximately 1,561,020 (+1,790)
tanks – 12,414 (+0)
armored combat vehicles – 25,552 (+15)
artillery systems – 51,242 (+9)
MLRS – 2,217 (+1)
anti-aircraft systems – 1,708 (+1)
aircraft – 449 (+6)
helicopters – 356 (+0)
ground robotic systems – 2,958 (+3)
operational-tactical level UAVs – 565,590 (+693)
cruise missiles – 5,130 (+0)
warships/boats – 35 (+0)
submarines – 2 (+0)
vehicles and fuel tanks – 163,554
(+230) special equipment – 4,833 (+3) units
"Only the price on the chart can show the entrance to the deal..."
Re: WW3 Countdown
2613Although Trump himself appears to be pulling away from the Ukraine conflict, no surprise really considering the mess he’s got himself into over in the middle east, but the European leaders are still gungho marching towards a war with Russia.
And they are being encouraged by the US neocons such as retired general Kellogg who just yesterday said how easy it would be for NATO to take Kaliningrad and not to worry about Russia using nukes, they wouldn’t dare. Unbelievably moronic thinking from a paid actor or just a moron, who knows which.
The whole point of nuclear weapons is as a deterrent against attacks on a country's sovereignty that has worked for multiple countries extremely well for 75 years.
And what would a NATO attack on Kaliningrad be? A direct attack on Russian sovereignty, and that is the first reason Russia would use them. The second reason is because just what would NATO do if Russia fired a small tactical nuke at a NATO base somewhere in retaliation?
Absolutely nothing.
The reason they would do nothing is because NATO does not have escalation dominance, not against Russia they don't, the only thing NATO could do is trigger total nuclear war between Russia and the west.
The US is not going to sacrifice New York for Kaliningrad. Germany is not going to sacrifice Berlin for Kaliningrad.
Starting a war by attacking Russia on the premise that Russia won’t respond is the dumb thinking that started the Ukraine war in the first place.
So NATO is stuck, it can’t attack Russia directly, not without provoking a major conventional war that will automatically turn into a nuclear war.
The US really is not going to get involved unless they themselves are attacked first and Putin is just not going to do that.
The Euromorons on the other hand may well do something incredibly stupid because their backs are to the wall due to their incredible mismanagement of their own economies.
They really need Russia’s natural wealth to save them, it’s the only pot of gold within reach, and so the Euro elite oligarchy wants you to go and fight the Russians for them, thinking that the Russians won’t do anything serious to trigger the Americans. I think that’s a serious miscalculation.
I think that Putin knows the Americans won’t step in to save western Europe for the third time. Even if they did actually want to, the US just doesn't have the resources to fight another WW2 type ground war in Europe. They won’t even go into the middle east anymore let alone Europe.
Europe Wants Russia's Blood. Trump Wants Out
And they are being encouraged by the US neocons such as retired general Kellogg who just yesterday said how easy it would be for NATO to take Kaliningrad and not to worry about Russia using nukes, they wouldn’t dare. Unbelievably moronic thinking from a paid actor or just a moron, who knows which.
The whole point of nuclear weapons is as a deterrent against attacks on a country's sovereignty that has worked for multiple countries extremely well for 75 years.
And what would a NATO attack on Kaliningrad be? A direct attack on Russian sovereignty, and that is the first reason Russia would use them. The second reason is because just what would NATO do if Russia fired a small tactical nuke at a NATO base somewhere in retaliation?
Absolutely nothing.
The reason they would do nothing is because NATO does not have escalation dominance, not against Russia they don't, the only thing NATO could do is trigger total nuclear war between Russia and the west.
The US is not going to sacrifice New York for Kaliningrad. Germany is not going to sacrifice Berlin for Kaliningrad.
Starting a war by attacking Russia on the premise that Russia won’t respond is the dumb thinking that started the Ukraine war in the first place.
So NATO is stuck, it can’t attack Russia directly, not without provoking a major conventional war that will automatically turn into a nuclear war.
The US really is not going to get involved unless they themselves are attacked first and Putin is just not going to do that.
The Euromorons on the other hand may well do something incredibly stupid because their backs are to the wall due to their incredible mismanagement of their own economies.
They really need Russia’s natural wealth to save them, it’s the only pot of gold within reach, and so the Euro elite oligarchy wants you to go and fight the Russians for them, thinking that the Russians won’t do anything serious to trigger the Americans. I think that’s a serious miscalculation.
I think that Putin knows the Americans won’t step in to save western Europe for the third time. Even if they did actually want to, the US just doesn't have the resources to fight another WW2 type ground war in Europe. They won’t even go into the middle east anymore let alone Europe.
Europe Wants Russia's Blood. Trump Wants Out
