🌔 VZU TRADING SYSTEM 🌖

khanhviet1804 wrote: Fri Jun 12, 2026 5:47 pm Hello ujtrader, in the case where I place my first buy order using the 3-in-1 method, but later the fishnet pattern changes color, is the solution to the entry point to wait for the CHOCH pattern?

If you mean holding the trade after the Fisher Net has already changed color, then yes, I would stay in the trade and wait for a bearish CHOCH before exiting.

The reason is that Fisher Net is a repainting indicator, so a color change alone is not enough for me to close the position. I would want to see confirmation from market structure first.

Regarding your examples, I think the issue with the first trade is that the buy entry was taken in an extremely overbought zone. The second trade, however, looks much better and follows the setup more cleanly.

ujtrader wrote: Sat Jun 13, 2026 8:24 pm If you mean holding the trade after the Fisher Net has already changed color, then yes, I would stay in the trade and wait for a bearish CHOCH before exiting.

The reason is that Fisher Net is a repainting indicator, so a color change alone is not enough for me to close the position. I would want to see confirmation from market structure first.

Regarding your examples, I think the issue with the first trade is that the buy entry was taken in an extremely overbought zone. The second trade, however, looks much better and follows the setup more cleanly.

Thank you very much, Ujtrader. What I meant was that at the time I entered, the King grid hadn't changed color yet, but a few candles later, the King grid changed to a different color. Is there any way to find a better entry point?

khanhviet1804 wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 2:42 pm Thank you very much, Ujtrader. What I meant was that at the time I entered, the King grid hadn't changed color yet, but a few candles later, the King grid changed to a different color. Is there any way to find a better entry point?

If you're looking for better entries, stop focusing on indicators and start focusing on quality conditions first.

My rule is simple:

No liquidity sweep = No trade.
No displacement = No trade.
No Fair Value Gap (FVG) = No trade.
No session liquidity sweeps = No trade.

A good entry is not about getting in early t's about getting in after the market has revealed its intentions.

First, liquidity must be taken. Then price should show strong displacement. That displacement should leave behind an FVG, giving a logical area for retracement. Finally, the setup should align with a clear liquidity objective within the active trading session.

If any of these elements are missing, the probability of the setup decreases significantly. Patience is often the difference between a professional trade and a random trade.

in the following BTC trade, price first swept liquidity and then delivered strong displacement, breaking the recent low and leaving behind a Fair Value Gap (FVG). I took an aggressive entry on the retest of the FVG's midpoint, targeting a 1:3 risk-to-reward ratio.

ujtrader wrote: Sat Jun 20, 2026 11:16 pm If you're looking for better entries, stop focusing on indicators and start focusing on quality conditions first.

My rule is simple:

No liquidity sweep = No trade.
No displacement = No trade.
No Fair Value Gap (FVG) = No trade.
No session liquidity sweeps = No trade.

A good entry is not about getting in early t's about getting in after the market has revealed its intentions.

First, liquidity must be taken. Then price should show strong displacement. That displacement should leave behind an FVG, giving a logical area for retracement. Finally, the setup should align with a clear liquidity objective within the active trading session.

If any of these elements are missing, the probability of the setup decreases significantly. Patience is often the difference between a professional trade and a random trade.

in the following BTC trade, price first swept liquidity and then delivered strong displacement, breaking the recent low and leaving behind a Fair Value Gap (FVG). I took an aggressive entry on the retest of the FVG's midpoint, targeting a 1:3 risk-to-reward ratio.

Thank you very much, ujtrader. I'm learning your trading methods.

ujtrader wrote: Sat Jun 20, 2026 11:16 pm If you're looking for better entries, stop focusing on indicators and start focusing on quality conditions first.

My rule is simple:

No liquidity sweep = No trade.
No displacement = No trade.
No Fair Value Gap (FVG) = No trade.
No session liquidity sweeps = No trade.

A good entry is not about getting in early t's about getting in after the market has revealed its intentions.

First, liquidity must be taken. Then price should show strong displacement. That displacement should leave behind an FVG, giving a logical area for retracement. Finally, the setup should align with a clear liquidity objective within the active trading session.

If any of these elements are missing, the probability of the setup decreases significantly. Patience is often the difference between a professional trade and a random trade.

in the following BTC trade, price first swept liquidity and then delivered strong displacement, breaking the recent low and leaving behind a Fair Value Gap (FVG). I took an aggressive entry on the retest of the FVG's midpoint, targeting a 1:3 risk-to-reward ratio.

Hi Ujtrader, Thanks for sharing your insights. Would you be so kind to share your template with us?

Thanks you!

ujtrader wrote: Sat Jun 20, 2026 11:16 pm If you're looking for better entries, stop focusing on indicators and start focusing on quality conditions first.

My rule is simple:

No liquidity sweep = No trade.
No displacement = No trade.
No Fair Value Gap (FVG) = No trade.
No session liquidity sweeps = No trade.

A good entry is not about getting in early t's about getting in after the market has revealed its intentions.

First, liquidity must be taken. Then price should show strong displacement. That displacement should leave behind an FVG, giving a logical area for retracement. Finally, the setup should align with a clear liquidity objective within the active trading session.

If any of these elements are missing, the probability of the setup decreases significantly. Patience is often the difference between a professional trade and a random trade.

in the following BTC trade, price first swept liquidity and then delivered strong displacement, breaking the recent low and leaving behind a Fair Value Gap (FVG). I took an aggressive entry on the retest of the FVG's midpoint, targeting a 1:3 risk-to-reward ratio.

Hi Ujtrader, Thanks for sharing your insights. Would you be so kind to share your template with us?

Thanks you!

jarouwitjames wrote: Mon Jun 22, 2026 1:07 am Hi Ujtrader, Thanks for sharing your insights. Would you be so kind to share your template with us?

Thanks you!

’m using a template shared by Dimkin
Template:
post1295580449.html#p1295580449


I only added two extra indicators to Subwindow 1, both with their default settings:
1. RHO
download/file.php?id=3453486

2. Extreme Spike v2
attach/file/3527417


Additionally, I added one more indicator that identifies No Supply and No Demand candles based on Volume Spread Analysis (VSA) principles.
download/file.php?id=3503055

Other than these three additions, the template remains unchanged. just download original template add those 3 indicators with default settings.

thanks

ujtrader wrote: Mon Jun 22, 2026 3:32 am ’m using a template shared by Dimkin
Template:
post1295580449.html#p1295580449


I only added two extra indicators to Subwindow 1, both with their default settings:
1. RHO
download/file.php?id=3453486

2. Extreme Spike v2
attach/file/3527417


Additionally, I added one more indicator that identifies No Supply and No Demand candles based on Volume Spread Analysis (VSA) principles.
download/file.php?id=3503055

Other than these three additions, the template remains unchanged. just download original template add those 3 indicators with default settings.

thanks

Thanks Ujtrader, appreciate you!

Hello everyone, I have an important question I'd like to ask. I'm Chinese and want to use the excellent "VZU Trading System" to analyze the Chinese stock market (A-shares). However, I can't access Chinese stock market data on MT4 or MT5, so I can't solve this problem for now. But I discovered that "TradingView" can analyze the Chinese stock market. The problem I'm encountering is that our system uses MT4 indicators, which aren't available on TradingView. Is there any way to use "VZU Trading System" system to analyze data on TradingView? Please help! Thank you all so much, and thank you very much to the blogger vzulaks for creating such an excellent system and sharing it so freely.

saoco wrote: Fri Jun 26, 2026 1:09 pm Hello everyone, I have an important question I'd like to ask. I'm Chinese and want to use the excellent "VZU Trading System" to analyze the Chinese stock market (A-shares). However, I can't access Chinese stock market data on MT4 or MT5, so I can't solve this problem for now. But I discovered that "TradingView" can analyze the Chinese stock market. The problem I'm encountering is that our system uses MT4 indicators, which aren't available on TradingView. Is there any way to use "VZU Trading System" system to analyze data on TradingView? Please help! Thank you all so much, and thank you very much to the blogger vzulaks for creating such an excellent system and sharing it so freely.

Export the data from Tradingview and in Metatrader create a custom symbol and import the data you had exported here.