Re: MT4 Indicator requests and ideas

21651
Is there a simple way of 'attaching' a trendline to a stochastic indicator without having to manually enter the stochastic values?
I'm trying to simplify using Andrei's indicator (attached) without manually entering the stochs values. This indi can be used on CCI and RSI as well as Stochastic.
The chart trendline automatically finds the high and low values and I'd like to get a trendline that automatically goes over or under a stochs value.
Thanks if it can be done.
TEAMTRADER
These users thanked the author TEAMTRADER for the post:
Abdi


Re: MT4 Indicator requests and ideas

21653
Try to rewrite the i-AnyRangeCld.mq5 version into an MT4 version and compare it with Teacher XARD's XU DAILY OPEN LINE indicator. I didn't expect it to be so difficult, and I wasn't successful. If the teacher is interested, why not rewrite an i-AnyRangeCld.mq4? It would be greatly appreciated!

Re: MT4 Indicator requests and ideas

21654
markw118 wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2020 9:26 pm Hi,
Repaint or not doesn`t matter this indicator telling you direction. I`m using it more for exit,but never entry trade.When symbol 4 appear and settle is reversal.Symbol 3 is a price correction on the main movement.This indi not suppose to not be use on its own and never as entry signal but is very important part of my system.
I only did asked Mr Tools for add alerts and advise settings as in my opinion is to sensitive so i would adjust to be more precise at all
below example XTIUSD SP500 M30 last Friday
esse indicador tem ele gratuito amigo, por favor poste aqui pra mim fazer os testes


Re: MT4 Indicator requests and ideas

21656
thomdel wrote: Thu Sep 18, 2025 7:09 pm Indicator : ! StepMA_3D_v3.01

Reason for request : This indicator shows good results with default params.


Respected mrtools Sir,

If possible & if you find useful for all then Request you to Please Kindly Add the following features :

1) Button
2) Colour Candles based on crossover of 2 step lines :--- as shown in attachment pic *
3) Line colour - Line width // shadow colour - shadow width
4) Various MA
5) colour filling between this 2 step lines. : ( available in StepMA_3D_v3_Cloud : MT5 indicator )
6) Arrows on crossover of 2 step lines.


Thanks for each & every upload.
Thanks for all drop down menus, various options, mods, new ideas.
Thanks for your time, efforts, generosity.
Thanks again & again.
Hello, somehow missed your request, sorry about that!

Not sure if I will be able to make changes on that version but can possibly make a new version and probably add your request, just not sure how close to this version it will be.
These users thanked the author mrtools for the post:
thomdel

Re: MT4 Indicator requests and ideas

21658
mrtools wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 8:53 pm Hello, somehow missed your request, sorry about that!

Not sure if I will be able to make changes on that version but can possibly make a new version and probably add your request, just not sure how close to this version it will be.



Respected mrtools Sir,

Thanks for the consideration. No Problem.

It was just a idea as : The indicator : ! StepMA_3D_v3.01 : showed good results with default params.

Kindly Try If manageable in near future otherswise it's ok.


Thanks for your Support & Generosity.
Thanks a Lot.
These users thanked the author thomdel for the post:
mrtools

Re: MT4 Indicator requests and ideas

21659
thomdel wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 9:04 pm Respected mrtools Sir,

Thanks for the consideration. No Problem.

It was just a idea as : The indicator : ! StepMA_3D_v3.01 : showed good results with default params.

Kindly Try If manageable in near future otherswise it's ok.


Thanks for your Support & Generosity.
Thanks a Lot.
Hello , kept going around and round with this indicator because of the way the atr minimum and maximum was being done, finally dawned on me this is exactly the same problem as the step stochastic which Mladen fixed. This was his explanation

Since I first saw it, I have always liked the idea of a step stochastic. But every single version I have seen had two very serious flaws:

minimum and maximum average true range are inherited from a previous bar

and thus it makes it depend on the number of bars used in calculations. The rest of the calculations depends on that "inherited" value, and, since with time the minimum and the maximum are just getting bigger (maximum) and smaller (minimum), the "step quality" of the step stochastic is simply lost when big enough number of bars pass. So the step stochastic becomes deformed and is not a "step" stochastic any more on newest bars.

This one solves those issues. The idea is simple — instead of inheriting previous state of ATR minimum and maximums, the minimum and maximum are cheсked in a "Window" number of past bars. That way it is not deformed and is reacting to latest data fairly good. Compared to the "old" ones you will notice that at the beginning they have the same values (since the "old" still did not "deform") but as time passes the differences grow bigger and bigger. That is the effect of not inheriting and in the end of not repainting.

So anyway, used the fixed step stochastic code to make a new non-repainting version. The results are different so posting it here to see if you still want to do the modifications you requested.
These users thanked the author mrtools for the post (total 3):
太虚一毫, thomdel, Jimmy

Re: MT4 Indicator requests and ideas

21660
mrtools wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 8:10 am Hello , kept going around and round with this indicator because of the way the atr minimum and maximum was being done, finally dawned on me this is exactly the same problem as the step stochastic which Mladen fixed. This was his explanation

Since I first saw it, I have always liked the idea of a step stochastic. But every single version I have seen had two very serious flaws:

minimum and maximum average true range are inherited from a previous bar

and thus it makes it depend on the number of bars used in calculations. The rest of the calculations depends on that "inherited" value, and, since with time the minimum and the maximum are just getting bigger (maximum) and smaller (minimum), the "step quality" of the step stochastic is simply lost when big enough number of bars pass. So the step stochastic becomes deformed and is not a "step" stochastic any more on newest bars.

This one solves those issues. The idea is simple — instead of inheriting previous state of ATR minimum and maximums, the minimum and maximum are cheсked in a "Window" number of past bars. That way it is not deformed and is reacting to latest data fairly good. Compared to the "old" ones you will notice that at the beginning they have the same values (since the "old" still did not "deform") but as time passes the differences grow bigger and bigger. That is the effect of not inheriting and in the end of not repainting.

So anyway, used the fixed step stochastic code to make a new non-repainting version. The results are different so posting it here to see if you still want to do the modifications you requested.
Thank you very much for releasing this version. The teacher's merits are boundless! :thumbup:
These users thanked the author 太虚一毫 for the post:
mrtools