I like his explanation on stationarity.


RObert Sungenis is a geocentrist (believes the earth is at the center of the universe) and i'm leaning more and more his way.

it makes sense. The sagnac detects rotation, but the michelson-morley doesn't detect revolution
this only makes sense if the stars are rotating and the earth is still.

and all the data from suncalc is right. This data doesn't make a lot of sense on a flat earth.

there is also the issue that "we see too far". But most of the times, it's during specific periods of the year, where meteorological conditions are met so that there is refraction that bends light. I think it makes sense. Even If I previously fought against it.

We live on a earth with auto charging vehicles now

very interesting

The real fight isn't Flat Earth VS Globe Earth

it's always been Geocentrism VS Heliocentrism

Albert Einstein wrote,
"If the Michelson–Morley experiment had not brought us into serious embarrassment, no one would have regarded the relativity theory as a (halfway) redemption."

The Michelson-Morley experiment proves earth is not moving(revolving OR rotating), which is a big problem for a scientist, because it makes the earth "special"

the Theory of Relativity "explains" the MM results and finds a way to interpret it differently

but it's just utter garbage and fabrication....

We need to gather evidence to convince the unbelievers!

wojtek wrote: Wed Jun 04, 2025 5:42 am We need to gather evidence to convince the unbelievers!

shit that must be the best proof yet