Hello Sir.hesam-moon wrote: Thu Jul 27, 2023 3:25 pm This is an example of the submissions of friends. 123 patterns
could you please share your template.
the settings and combination of them is nice.
thank you
Hello Sir.hesam-moon wrote: Thu Jul 27, 2023 3:25 pm This is an example of the submissions of friends. 123 patterns
Hello sir, this template is not mine and I found it in this thread.But the settings of this zigzag are specified inside the orbit templatecommodus wrote: Thu Jul 27, 2023 9:30 pm Hello Sir.
could you please share your template.
the settings and combination of them is nice.
thank you
Hahahaha ----------------> And I thought I did not understand what is meant by the 123 pattern in fact this is the Orbit template manually inscribed with the numbers 123 to show progression the way we have specified for Orbit but using the developers sense because he or she (I think this is an @ImPlanT output from the looks of) would rather use numbers than our letters in Orbit. But in fact if you look at your Orbit templates the points you see now on the screenshot would be marked by Semaphore Crowns (on any time frame) by A (3) A for Aqua, G (4) G for Gold and M (5) M for Magenta. I think the developer of the 123 system invented the numbers to suit his own understanding of the Orbit lettering so it is correct and will always be - the market fractal is a triangulation and that is what we see any which way you kick the market. Very interesting that I thought I did not understand the "system" now I do. Good Job.commodus wrote: Thu Jul 27, 2023 9:30 pm Hello Sir.
could you please share your template.
the settings and combination of them is nice.
thank you
Brother, check this indicator that I sent, it is really interesting.Darkdoji wrote: Thu Jul 27, 2023 10:28 pm Hahahaha ----------------> And I thought I did not understand what is meant by the 123 pattern in fact this is the Orbit template manually inscribed with the numbers 123 to show progression the way we have specified for Orbit but using the developers sense because he or she (I think this is an @ImPlanT output from the looks of) would rather use numbers than our letters in Orbit. But in fact if you look at your Orbit templates the points you see now on the screenshot would be marked by Semaphore Crowns (on any time frame) by A (3) A for Aqua, G (4) G for Gold and M (5) M for Magenta. I think the developer of the 123 system invented the numbers to suit his own understanding of the Orbit lettering so it is correct and will always be - the market fractal is a triangulation and that is what we see any which way you kick the market. Very interesting that I thought I did not understand the "system" now I do. Good Job.
(-_-)
I will for sure.hesam-moon wrote: Thu Jul 27, 2023 11:00 pm Brother, check this indicator that I sent, it is really interesting.
1) Yes a great match well done M1 {M(5) Pivot is = a H4} pivot and as you can see on Signal change it moved well no problem.ItalianTrader wrote: Fri Jul 28, 2023 12:22 am Hey Samm, @DarkDoji
What do you think about this :
Starting from the fact that the magenta is correctly matched with y2 h4, i was thinking , is this still a valid entry even if kso and fractal pattern and spot is red? Now they are temporary back to red, but i assume they were green when i was not present at the screen by watching the graph. What do you think?
This and all the other "systems" like it trade cyclic trend which is what Orbit trades as well. But Orbit comprehends the strange attractor which is the fixed path of price and therefore its parts and the behaviours that can be projected forward in time. Orbit also times the behaviour based on the idea of the inductive construction of the parts (pattern), by explaining a) Folding and b) Stretching as the basic mechanism by which price moves. Then Orbit explains the primitive behaviour of price as a bijective transformation across all scales with inverse on and therefore shows people (traders), that the market is deterministic - (admits no randomness into its future states - it is a fixed pattern). But that is to say markets trade point to point - and therefore for any true signal at a pivot low or high there is no risk (zero risk), between the begin and end points. Then Orbit employs Kinematics (the geometry of motion without reference to cause), to define amplitudes along with transform functions to crosscheck (that is what our inverse on commands are based). The idea is that when we say go in Orbit the experienced Orbit goes for it knowing that it is almost certainty to win no matter the range (e.g. traders can do 10k points in Gold following Orbit in one day even from scalping Orbit). I could go on and on - but my real point is that all that have been posted on the thread like this "system" are good and follow the Orbit logic but without Orbit's information and therefore confidence in trade. They should all work well because that is how the market works. What I cannot say (seeing them for the first time), is how they time and what they time. Unless you time aperiodic cycles of a shape (or its actual shape in this case), you would make far less money than you can trading like this. But I assume they are all good approaches. I can relate to them and understand their logic without knowing more than the screenshot here. Nice one!sal wrote: Thu Jul 27, 2023 5:14 pm Your entry position is at LH/HLs right !
a different approach of mine
Users browsing this forum: adrian009, DotNetDotCom [Bot], IBM oBot [Bot], lukgoku, Proximic [Bot], TCT_bx, yogibear13 and 139 guests