keys898 wrote: Tue Oct 04, 2022 6:15 am You still would be off back testing it yourself. Just because he achieved X results doesn't mean you will. He could tell you blah and blah. I don't see how that would make you any more successful than back testing the strategy yourself since it still comes down to the trader. "Common sense". Asking for help isnt an issue. But if he hasnt even done all that work himself, then it becomes an issue.

chickensword wrote: Tue Oct 04, 2022 6:02 am can you please share your experience with this, what the win rate tended to be, how the lucky reversals behaved, and average risk to reward please for this older version that i modified of 2_2?

opita wrote: Tue Oct 04, 2022 6:21 am I would drop it, IMO unless you add a lot of context it is not worth the trouble.
Using HA candles on a higher timeframe would give you better results than the lucky reversal, specially in choppy markets.

chickensword wrote: Tue Oct 04, 2022 6:23 am ok fair to have an opinion but
im asking for his experience not yours what is going on, m9 m8 m7 m6 m5 m4 m3 m2 m1?

just please go away m8

keys898 wrote: Tue Oct 04, 2022 6:35 am You quoted him in your original post..... hence its assumed you asked him the question..

chickensword wrote: Tue Oct 04, 2022 6:23 am ok fair to have an opinion but
im asking for his experience not yours what is going on, m9 m8 m7 m6 m5 m4 m3 m2 m1?

just please go away m8

Woodyz wrote: Tue Oct 04, 2022 4:28 pm Come on now pull yr head in.
Chicken Thats a hybrid of the XU-Hybrid so suggest you either personal message the person concerned or start a new thread. IMO

RplusT wrote: Thu Sep 29, 2022 11:16 am Beatle, if you are looking to trade levels, you may want to use this one. It's pretty accurate all day long.


JJN-Fibo.mq4