Out of my trades in profit far less than I hoped and even less than I last reported as you can see @ circa 5k < the 7k I showed last but at this point not sure what is going on anymore as such standing down. Best sense of the market I have is probably a Y (2) down on 6n circa 1983 less than that might imply a short-term reversal. So watching now what happens.

(-_-)

ForexFux wrote: Fri Nov 24, 2023 2:44 am I think I know now what I did. I was analyzing the 30m gold chart not the 4h.

I have posted my comment when price was somewhere in the red cycle on the attached screenshot. Also, where now a M(5) crown head is was a G(4) head before when I wrote my post.

Here is what I wrote:

Does this mean that because we have a global M(5) low on the H4 but no gold low, price should go higher to "repaint" the recent G(4) high to a M(5) high?

replace H4 with M30.

I thought price has to go higher in order to let the semafor print a new M(5) high to match the M(5) low. Remember, the exact same high at this time showed only a G(4) high crown. What I find strange is that price went lower and changed the g(4) high to a m(5) high. I hope you know what I mean.

Yes you suggest some kind of repainting occurred. Not something so frequent I can say I understand or even explain and would only suspect that by some kind of lateness in the tool updating or something that happened. But as is, it is the correct match for 6n or H4 given M30 = M, H1 = G, H4 = A. I would work with that and not bother too much about the repaint you suggest occurred.

(-_-)

ImpLaNT wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2023 8:38 am Yesterday I sold gold, again I am trading the pullback without risk-free coverage...
Sorry, after opening it I went straight to bed, so I’m only posting it now. It looks like the bottom of the near space has been reached (n-2n) KSO in the bottom line, but for the target I’m looking at 1980 for now, maybe I’ll have to adjust it, who knows...

Closed sales in a pullback. I earned almost nothing (+34.7 pips). It is not always possible to make a profit by trading pullbacks. This is exactly the case. But any minimal profit is much better than a loss. Therefore everything is good.

And of course price then takes off in my former direction rather than change toward my suspected direction. So? For me "nothing spoil" as we say in Nigeria --> I was not so sure to have committed to the former position at that point and acted to protect my capital and profit. Did the theory support my action? No but the range was uncertain from 6n FP so was my judgement to better respect that uncertainty. Am I feeling sore right now? No I absolutely do not care but watching to see where a clear advantage will be ahead ---> all together my decisions to this point have made me better off and it is a fluctuation ongoing so we shall see. But in the article I am writing you will see that everyone with the same information would act as they feel and the bottom line is that on average the tool will give enough information to enable you come off better off in the end. Which is the whole point ----------> that bit "in the end". Note this is not excusing myself just stating the reality since I doubt that one can be spot on every time. Back to work.

(-_-)

PS: Also I do tend to become discouraged when price stays in FLE for too long and it has been 3 days in that structure now, though of course that is also good many times as it can jump in direction after compressing range tightly in that long stay.

I entered into a buy on gold at 1994. The base is - M and L Ordinals are looking up, S - shows a upward pullback (I hope that the arrow will change to an upward one over time). n-7n TT are open upward, Cyclicality are all green. That is, we have (n-7n) TT + Cy.
But the market today is extremely sluggish, so there are some concerns. But I will hope for mathematics

ImpLaNT wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 4:56 pm First, to log in using a command, you must wait for the pullback to complete. Pullbacks can be of different depths. It is very difficult to determine in advance the depth of the pullback. But there must be at least a full-fledged pullback in the near space. That is, the KSO oscillator must move at least n-2n partitions to the bottom line (for an upward movement). Only such situation can be considered minimally sufficient to reopen a position according to the appearance of a new command.
For example, in the current situation, we see that at the minimum point of the current pullback, KSO was unable to transfer the n-2n partitions to the bottom line, which means the pullback is insufficient and it is not worth entering a buy when a new command appears, wait until the pullback ends.

Hi,

This post discloses a problem what I see with the screenface. When you are not in front of your screen or can't watch the charts at the moment when n-2n is at -kso amplitude in a FLE or retracement before n-2n move again to R or higher, you will never know what was going on and if the entry criteria was met or not. What I want to say is that by comparison with normal oscillator indicators, the orbit oscillator model has no visual history on which you can base your decision.

ForexFux wrote: Fri Nov 24, 2023 10:37 pm Hi,

This post discloses a problem what I see with the screenface. When you are not in front of your screen or can't watch the charts at the moment when n-2n is at -kso amplitude in a FLE or retracement before n-2n move again to R or higher, you will never know what was going on and if the entry criteria was met or not. What I want to say is that by comparison with normal oscillator indicators, the orbit oscillator model has no visual history on which you can base your decision.

Use Trade Control or fit an Oscillator you like into screenface. I think you can fit at least one indicator into screenface but I would rather use Trade Control.

(-_-)

ForexFux wrote: Fri Nov 24, 2023 10:37 pm

Yes, you are absolutely right, Orbit can't be viewed in history. Its for this reason that when I studied its behavior I used an indicator that takes screenshots at a certain time interval, I still have it in my template, you can see the green button at the top of my screenshots. I used a shooting interval of 15 minutes, more often there is no point.
But now I practically don’t use it due to lack of need. Even in the morning I don’t look at these screenshots overnight.
When you understand how space is divided, how attractors look correctly, you will no longer have this need. And secondly, the Orbit screenface is very slow, that is, if the KSO takes on some significant state, such as n-2n, this state is maintained for several hours, you can't help but notice it. I think that during the day everyone is capable of looking at the monitor at least twice an hour.

ForexFux wrote: Fri Nov 24, 2023 10:37 pm Hi,

This post discloses a problem what I see with the screenface. When you are not in front of your screen or can't watch the charts at the moment when n-2n is at -kso amplitude in a FLE or retracement before n-2n move again to R or higher, you will never know what was going on and if the entry criteria was met or not. What I want to say is that by comparison with normal oscillator indicators, the orbit oscillator model has no visual history on which you can base your decision.

Hi,
Getting a bit better after Covid so I am looking for some buy trades which might happen later with the red news. It's as Samm means about news, it is usually just an excuse to move price about before going in the direction it should be going.

As for the screenface, that's always going to be the problem with using MT4 apart from the obvious with it freezing, especially after long periods or rapid price movements and you need to change timeframes every so often and at least before taking a trade just to make sure. To know what the market is doing you really to watch most of the time as I notice things that happen with price that cannot be hidden from Orbit as it tracks it and turns out most of those are designed to trap traders into trades that only go a short distance before reversing, luckily an n closed warning on TT alerts you to this fact and best just exit at a small loss.
A cloud version would eliminate these problems as it would not depend on MT4 and it would read and replace the current screenface with a simpler text based system instead of you having to work out all the different things for yourself. I dare say because of this LOG page or something would show when and what was triggered and at what time giving something to look back at, as it would have happened in real time and kept for x amount of time. Samm said there was other things that could be added to Orbit as it would not have to depend on trade terminal limitations, that is why it was always his dream of using a cloud based way of showing Orbit.

Davie

Sometimes when I watch news on Orbit I cannot help but think things are leaked ahead to the tool. Every time it is positioned so that it fits. Amazing to me frankly. No brag at all.

(-_-)