Re: XARD - Simple Trend Following Trading System
18812Today's newspaper
XARD: If Carlsberg made charts... Probably the best charts in the world
Re: XARD - Simple Trend Following Trading System
18813Could the setup work if the arrow is also a square arrow? The setup could also be: Square - Big DOT - minidot?budhi1976 wrote: Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:44 pm How about a challenge?
I’ll explain one way to trade the XARD system (This is what I personally use). Your mission: open a $1,000 demo account, install XARD v65m, and test this strategy diligently in M1 or M5 for at least two full weeks—day in, day out, without missing a session.
Here’s the strategy:
Ignore the square semafor (Yes, you read that right—ignore it).
1. Wait for a blue arrow (if you're looking for a buy trade).
2. After the blue arrow appears, wait for the 2nd blue dot (the 1st dot will be violet). When you see it, do not enter a buy trade yet—wait.
3. Wait for a mini green dot to appear. Once it does, enter a buy trade, use 1% to 3% of your balance
4. Hold your trade and only exit when a red arrow appears.
For a sell trade, the sequence is:
- Down arrow → 2nd violet dot → 2nd mini red-orange dot.
For a buy trade, the sequence is:
- Up arrow → 2nd blue dot → 2nd mini green dot.
If the sequence isn’t fulfilled, do not enter a trade.
Are you up for the challenge?
2.PNG
I am borrowing Lenono's pic from her post here: post1295556282.html#p1295556282![]()
Re: XARD - Simple Trend Following Trading System
18814textbook counter trend 2nd dot entry on GU
trade mgnt:
closed half, set SL to BE, trade closed near tp (big dot appears)
trade mgnt:
closed half, set SL to BE, trade closed near tp (big dot appears)
"That which is, already has been; that which is to be, already has been;"
Re: XARD - Simple Trend Following Trading System
18815The purpose of this challenge is to develop your experience, simply try this challenge 1st, after two weeks, then I am sure you will be able to answer your own question
Vakarox wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2024 9:10 pm Could the setup work if the arrow is also a square arrow? The setup could also be: Square - Big DOT - minidot?
Re: XARD - Simple Trend Following Trading System
18816lenono?
anyway I prefer to evaluate only the arrows by irrigating the square, mine is a choice, not a rule, if you don't want to wait for the arrow in vain and you want to know when it will appear you can use the channel as a reference, try bye
the square arrow as I see it loses its effectiveness of direction when there is the second point arrow circle.
As long as there is a square/arrow and a circle/arrow of opposite direction to the square/arrow the direction refers to circle/arrow.
I hope the translation is correct


the square arrow as I see it loses its effectiveness of direction when there is the second point arrow circle.
As long as there is a square/arrow and a circle/arrow of opposite direction to the square/arrow the direction refers to circle/arrow.
I hope the translation is correct
Re: XARD - Simple Trend Following Trading System
18817Haha I am very sorry, mistype and did not re-check. Once again, So sorry for it 
Lenovo wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2024 11:27 pm lenono?![]()
anyway I prefer to evaluate only the arrows by irrigating the square, mine is a choice, not a rule, if you don't want to wait for the arrow in vain and you want to know when it will appear you can use the channel as a reference, try bye
the square arrow as I see it loses its effectiveness of direction when there is the second point arrow circle.
As long as there is a square/arrow and a circle/arrow of opposite direction to the square/arrow the direction refers to circle/arrow.
I hope the translation is correct
Re: XARD - Simple Trend Following Trading System
18818The Square before selling was on the small green circle, sell on the 5 minute chart Us 30 on the red circle triangle with two small grey circles, which would be the two green and orange minidots of the Xard 18 traffic light
Re: XARD - Simple Trend Following Trading System
18819beautiful drop
- These users thanked the author Neroloft for the post (total 4):
- budhi1976, Curioso, tmostafa007, Yoshinosuke
"That which is, already has been; that which is to be, already has been;"