may be.. i hope mladen updated the half trend . May be it is a nrp version but stardard or not updated.
Re: Trend Indicators for MT4
#922In fact I am not using this indicator in my chart, however, It is not repainting, you may check it in 1 min or in tester.
Re: Trend Indicators for MT4
#923The reason for not published the the source is respecting the rule of the forum, as they emphasis about that, unless they do it.sal wrote: ↑Fri Apr 02, 2021 3:48 pmhere is the source file posted in this forum..
public posted.
app.php/attach/file/3326617
Thanks
Re: Trend Indicators for MT4
#924OK, but this one is given by another member, not mladen or mrtools.sal wrote: ↑Fri Apr 02, 2021 3:48 pmhere is the source file posted in this forum..
public posted.
app.php/attach/file/3326617
I do not remember exactly when I got this indicator may be from the very old forum TSD.
Re: Trend Indicators
#925Hello dear Mladen,can you make mt5 version of this excelent half trend? i have found some mq5 half trend,without push alerts,but with alerts,but i think its based on same old version of mt4.mladen wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:37 amI have explained a long time ago but here is one "shortened version" again : half trend (the usual version that can be found on forums including older version that I posted too) , can and will repaint in some cases. The "nrp" version will not.
Here is just a part of the new code (that will sure help you determine find out in the existing code(s) what is the issue in half trend indicators, and I am quiet confident that you shall soon produce nrp version for net users too so that all can benefit from the knowledge accumulated in comparison modes) :
Capture.JPG
And then (when all the issues that can happen are going to be solved) even foolish nonsense like this can be made one fine day (all as a result of a coding progress we are all witnessing these days) :
example.png
But don't take my word for it : after all everybody can test whatever is posted on the wide, wide netand all the experts out there are by all means going to find out one day eventually what is going on with some sorts of code that can cause issues
Hope to hear from you.
Thank you
Re: Trend Indicators
#926Hi Mladen / Mr Tools?
Do you know if it is possible to make Half Trend transition faster?
With older versions you can set the Amplitude to negative (-1). It looks good on a visual backtest but in Realtime it actually can lag even more than amp +1. I believe this is due to using future values?
Perhaps there's a way to make a 'Zero Lag' Half Trend, something like the Zero Lag Hull Moving Average? Maybe it is possible to set lower MA values?
I've attached an example comparing the two.
Half Trend is a great indicator in steady trending markets, but it struggles with faster directional changes.
Re: Trend Indicators
#927Regarding negative "amplitude" I have a simple proposal :Narco wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 1:49 pmHi Mladen / Mr Tools?
Do you know if it is possible to make Half Trend transition faster?
With older versions you can set the Amplitude to negative (-1). It looks good on a visual backtest but in Realtime it actually can lag even more than amp +1. I believe this is due to using future values?
Perhaps there's a way to make a 'Zero Lag' Half Trend, something like the Zero Lag Hull Moving Average? Maybe it is possible to set lower MA values?
I've attached an example comparing the two.
Half Trend is a great indicator in steady trending markets, but it struggles with faster directional changes.
- Why don't we simply decide that the future is a known?
- So we shall simply scrap the fact that we do not know what shall happen in the future
- Then all our problems with "predictions" will be solved
- So : tomorrow EURUSD shall be 2.00
- Do not believe it?
- Why "believe" when I "know"
Please, if the math model does not have a sound ground for using some values (take the regression analysis as an example), one, and only one possible reason exists to display past values better fit in the past to past future values (since actual values are going to be changed all the time) and will make those values, as far as indicators like half trend are concerned, useless : to scam people into believing that it is a wonder
Re: Trend Indicators
#928Thanks, I appreciate the response.mladen wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 6:17 pmPlease, if the math model does not have a sound ground for using some values (take the regression analysis as an example), one, and only one possible reason exists to display past values better fit in the past to past future values (since actual values are going to be changed all the time) and will make those values, as far as indicators like half trend are concerned, useless : to scam people into believing that it is a wonder
I 100% agree with you, so I was just asking was there any alternatives to make it transition a bit faster without using negative amplitude.
As far as the indicator being a scam. It definitely isn't a holy grail but it can be a useful tool for alerting and heads up for PA directional changes.
Cheers
Re: Trend Indicators
#929That indicator, if calculated the original way, is not a scamNarco wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 6:33 pmThanks, I appreciate the response.
I 100% agree with you, so I was just asking was there any alternatives to make it transition a bit faster without using negative amplitude.
As far as the indicator being a scam. It definitely isn't a holy grail but it can be a useful tool for alerting and heads up for PA directional changes.
Cheers
Making it using negative "amplitude" would be deception at the least (if not straight scam)
Re: Trend Indicators
#930It is a very good indicator.
Maybe it is possible to speed up the transitions using a different (faster) MA instead of changing amplitude?
-
Similar Topics
-
3 Replies
2716 Views -
0 Replies
1451 Views
-