funchi wrote: Fri Jan 05, 2024 7:44 pm This has already been posted,

I have determined that the "RSI ma simple+Arrows 1.1" indicator is a redraw type.
This is why the simulation results are better.

Do you still need an answer to your question?

While i am backtesting this indicator i dont see any repaint after bar is closed. (testing in 1 minute chart)

funchi wrote: Fri Jan 05, 2024 3:26 pm Uploaded the latest version (240.105).
The indicators that I have posted individually so far are included.
Please download from post #1.
viewtopic.php?p=1295507591#p1295507591


The simulation-related version has gone from alpha to beta.

Thank you for all you do. I cant thank you enough.

josi wrote: Fri Jan 05, 2024 12:19 am May I ask:
what were the indicator's inputs?
did you rely solely on RSI (or did you use other instruments for bias)?
when did you enter?
where was your SL?
when did you exit?

I am not familiar with the "RSI ma simple+Arrows 1.1" indicator.
I will post as much as I can find out.


> what were the indicator's inputs?
I have attached the "RSI ma simple+Arrows 1.1" preset.

> did you rely solely on RSI (or did you use other instruments for bias)?
Only "RSI ma simple+Arrows 1.1" is available.

> when did you enter?
Refer to the image.
Sell when it changes from blue to red. Buy is the opposite.

> where was your SL?
None.

> when did you exit?
Sell when it changes from blue to red. Buy is the opposite.
This is repeated.
Closing and new orders are placed when the color of the line changes.

Let me know if you need a template for FNC_DB2.

ffsss wrote: Fri Jan 05, 2024 10:14 pm While i am backtesting this indicator i dont see any repaint after bar is closed. (testing in 1 minute chart)

I checked each Tick on a 15 minute time frame.
When it moves significantly in the opposite direction is when I redraw.

ffsss wrote: Fri Jan 05, 2024 7:29 am The results of that picture are real life or backtest? If they are backtest would it be possible to test a larger time?

We have determined that it is a redraw type indicator, so we have stopped running the EA.
Please let me know if you need a template for FNC_DB2.

funchi wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 9:45 am I checked each Tick on a 15 minute time frame.
When it moves significantly in the opposite direction is when I redraw.

I didnt see any redraw (after bar close), but will test it in 15min again and tell you just to make sure.

funchi wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2024 11:48 pm The "RSI ma simple+Arrows 1.1" had good simulation results, so I actually ran the EA to find out if it was a redraw prank or the indicator's performance.

The results are good.

HeikenAshi is running the EA with SMA because of the redrawing.

Hmmm, my chart looks different for some reason?

funchi wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2024 10:59 am Indicator added.
!!!-MT4 X-SUPRES TF+1 (FNC_SUPRES_TF_1)

<Download>
In preparation.

Hey Funchi,
Hope you're having an awesome weekend? Out of your busy schedule, please don't forget about this. Thanks in advance, bruh.

Reverent wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 3:25 am Hey Funchi,
Hope you're having an awesome weekend? Out of your busy schedule, please don't forget about this. Thanks in advance, bruh.

Yes, I understand.
post1295531424.html#p1295531424

Hello Funchi
I have been testing several indicators, alone and combined, and I have found that when there is more than one indicator the system takes all that are used for input as output and does not consider the established criteria as output. For example, if I use ema, macd and rsi as inputs and only ema and macd as output, the test considers the three inputs to output, when there should only be two.
As a result of the same thing, I imagine, sometimes analyzing a pair gives me one result and then it can give me a totally different one.
Greetings and thanks
Also, I have a doubt, I have 3 indicators, from h4 to m30, when processing it in m15 it gives me a result, it seems to me that this should not be since the entry to the lowest time will be in m30 following h4

Thank you