Hi mrtools and other coders, hi all,
is there an indicator MACD with the option of choosing the two moving average for calculation (for ex. a simple and exponential moving average)?
Thanks

Lucmat

Hi all, no one is interested in a creation of an automated trading system? The idea behind this strategy (not mine) is very very simple but genial; All we need is a stable trading system with 54% winning rate and a profit factor of 1,50% (nothing special). Then we need to apply this trading system t...

mrtools wrote: Sun May 24, 2020 11:35 am

Interpolation added.

beware of repaint or, better, recalculating!

I attach yhe image of profit line after improvement: this result is without compounding...
Thanks

trying to give some others points. It all starts with a simple strategy, that has poor results. With the excel's secret recursive formula (that is the key), the results of the simple strategy improves, but not too much: in other words, the strategy wins 54% with a profit factor of 1,84. Then it need...

Hi all, in order to stimulate someone's skill, I post an image to show the difference between the results of the simple trading system before and after the usage of the excel's recursive formula that learns from the market ( a sort of artificial intelligence). Blue line is the result of system befor...

Hi all, watching some videos on youtube, I see an italian trader (a serious person and a great trader) making a simple but wonderful trading system with excel. The idea of trading is not great, but simple and had from 2001 a winning rate of 54% and a profit factor of 1,84, nothing special but it's o...

mrtools wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 1:33 am

Replace the bands with the dynamic zones?

yes, if it is possible! Thanks

Hi mrtools,
is it possible to add dynamic zone bands to this attached indicator?
Thanks in advance

Lucmat

mrtools wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:05 am

No repaint!

dear mrtools,
im observing the ssa normalized end-point indicator but sometimes it seems to repaint or recalculate or something similar.
but maybe that is the correct behaviour of it, because of its formula?
Thanks in advance

Lucmat