Re: XARD - Simple Trend Following Trading System

16331
Another new way of displaying signals.


It falls short of Curioso's checklist, but could the indicator in this post be used as a simple check?
post1295546480.html#p1295546480


This is a signal for lazy people like me who want to check easily.
However, you will need to check the 2nd dot and ZigZag yourself.
Note that the basic functionality of the v65m has not been changed.


‘XU v65f-XARD UNIVERSE’ was created based on “XU v65m-XARD UNIVERSE”.
‘v65f’, not “v65m”.


Functional changes/functional additions/functional deletions


The condition display has been added to the text box. (Display at bottom left)
  Direction of the last SQUARE.
  Direction of the last ARROW.
  Direction of the last 2nd Dot.
  Above, below or between ADR entry levels.
  Above or below the DAILY OPEN line.
  13ema above or below 55ema.
  CANDLE colour.
 All of these can be shown or hidden using the parameters.
 The bar position of the test depends on the parameter ‘inpAlertsOnCurrent’.
 The colour of the direction matches the colour of the candle colour.

The colour of the symbol is now displayed when all the textbox condition colours match.
The alert is now displayed when all the colours of a text box condition match.
The ADR line display function has been added.
The background colour is drawn according to the ADR value.The background colour is changed by the ‘OpenPosPercent=15%’ parameter of the ADR.
Initial values have been changed. (Semafor size, Semafor colour, candle colour, alert ON)


I wonder if the order in which the text box conditions are displayed is appropriate?
These users thanked the author funchi for the post (total 13):
ManilaSpurs, 88FX88, budhi1976, Mundu19, MarVas, Samoth, fnz, Cagliostro, eduarescobar, Andreas2000, knglerxst, Curioso, muhammadFarooq2k20
I have resigned from this forum due to a disagreement with Greg82


Re: XARD - Simple Trend Following Trading System

16333
[quote=funchi post_id=1295546569 time=1721351787 user_id=4953487]
Another new way of displaying signals.


It falls short of Curioso's checklist, but could the indicator in this post be used as a simple check?
https://forex-station.com/post1295546480.html#p1295546480


This is a signal for lazy people like me who want to check easily.
However, you will need to check the 2nd dot and ZigZag yourself.
Note that the basic functionality of the v65m has not been changed.


‘XU v65f-XARD UNIVERSE’ was created based on “XU v65m-XARD UNIVERSE”.
‘v65f’, not “v65m”.


Functional changes/functional additions/functional deletions


The condition display has been added to the text box. (Display at bottom left)
  Direction of the last SQUARE.
  Direction of the last ARROW.
  Direction of the last 2nd Dot.
  Above, below or between ADR entry levels.
  Above or below the DAILY OPEN line.
  13ema above or below 55ema.
  CANDLE colour.
 All of these can be shown or hidden using the parameters.
 The bar position of the test depends on the parameter ‘inpAlertsOnCurrent’.
 The colour of the direction matches the colour of the candle colour.

The colour of the symbol is now displayed when all the textbox condition colours match.
The alert is now displayed when all the colours of a text box condition match.
The ADR line display function has been added.
The background colour has been changed to the ADR standard.
Initial values have been changed. (Semafor size, Semafor colour, candle colour, alert ON)


I wonder if the order in which the text box conditions are displayed is appropriate?
[/quote]

Hi Funchi. Is there a chance you could modify the code to make the information fit at a higher resolution? Everything is bigger on my laptop. Or please tell me how I can modify the code myself to make the image more readable. Thank you for all your tips and information.
<3 <3 <3

Re: XARD - Simple Trend Following Trading System

16334
DaveTrader wrote: Fri Jul 19, 2024 9:53 am 1M-5M.png

One of Xard's more recent set-ups had higher time frame MA/Ribbon/candles, for example 1M chart with 5M MA's and candles. It does seem to smooth things out a little. Curious if anyone has run that set-up thru a backtest?
Thanks DaveTrader for your insights that am keenly following. Please remind me the setup you mention here though I have also seen it but cant recall which on it is.
Mundu

Re: XARD - Simple Trend Following Trading System

16335
This is fantastic, many thanks funchi.

A small question, Could you please clarify which indicator the background color change is based on?
funchi wrote: Fri Jul 19, 2024 11:16 am Another new way of displaying signals.


It falls short of Curioso's checklist, but could the indicator in this post be used as a simple check?
post1295546480.html#p1295546480


This is a signal for lazy people like me who want to check easily.
However, you will need to check the 2nd dot and ZigZag yourself.
Note that the basic functionality of the v65m has not been changed.


‘XU v65f-XARD UNIVERSE’ was created based on “XU v65m-XARD UNIVERSE”.
‘v65f’, not “v65m”.


Re: XARD - Simple Trend Following Trading System

16336
88FX88 wrote: Fri Jul 19, 2024 2:41 pm

Hi Funchi. Is there a chance you could modify the code to make the information fit at a higher resolution? Everything is bigger on my laptop. Or please tell me how I can modify the code myself to make the image more readable. Thank you for all your tips and information.
How has it been up to now?
Is this a v65f phenomenon?


Case 1.
If you can change the ‘Scale and layout’ setting in Windows, you can change 125% to 100%.
MT4 will then need to be restarted.
Case 2.
Try changing the values of sp1 and sp2.
I have resigned from this forum due to a disagreement with Greg82

Re: XARD - Simple Trend Following Trading System

16339
funchi wrote: Fri Jul 19, 2024 3:55 pm How has it been up to now?
Is this a v65f phenomenon?


Case 1.
If you can change the ‘Scale and layout’ setting in Windows, you can change 125% to 100%.
MT4 will then need to be restarted.
sett.PNG


Case 2.
Try changing the values of sp1 and sp2.
s1.PNG
I have the same case in every version of Xard. Now with your hint it's perfect.
The first option is not good. I have a higher resolution. When I change to a smaller one, everything looks bad.
The second option is perfect <3. I changed the scale and now it's perfect. Thank you very, very, very much <3 <3 <3
<3 <3 <3


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], horizon202, mazibee, TECHHDATE07 and 21 guests