Re: Best of Don The Con

311
you should be banned
everyday, same sh*t, your just shilling... advertising
this should not be alowed, I can understand a couple coments here and there
but your shilling like clockwork... I dk how this is tolerated
you post a couple relavant things just so you can keep shilling, its obvious


Re: Best of Don The Con

312
Tradehunter wrote: Mon Jun 03, 2024 2:08 am you should be banned
everyday, same sh*t, your just shilling... advertising
this should not be alowed, I can understand a couple coments here and there
but your shilling like clockwork... I dk how this is tolerated
You've just posted more unsubstantiated nonsense.šŸ˜‚

Please feel free to read the Forex-Station Rules that Jimmy posted at viewtopic.php?t=8472780, and then come back to this thread with a leg to stand on. Spoiler alert: You don't have one.šŸ˜‰
These users thanked the author JohnnyRy for the post:
Jedidiah
ā€œ[A]s we know, there are known knowns—there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns—that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don’t know we don’t know.ā€ā€”Donald Rumsfeld, 2002

Re: Best of Don The Con

314
Tradehunter wrote: Mon Jun 03, 2024 2:16 am they can make a new rule just for you, ive been here years
never seen this kind of crap before...
They already did. Please feel free to revisit Post #1 in this thread where a moderator directed me to start a thread for "Trump haters."

P.S... What exactly did you expect to find in a Trump haters thread entitled, "Best of Don The Con"?😬
ā€œ[A]s we know, there are known knowns—there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns—that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don’t know we don’t know.ā€ā€”Donald Rumsfeld, 2002


Re: Best of Don The Con

316
Tradehunter wrote: Mon Jun 03, 2024 2:23 am this is not my house shill
just a sugestion for the mods/owners
Best of luck to you in your backseat moderation quest. I don't believe that Jimmy is in the business of banning code and conversion contributors for their political speech in the Lounge. I say again, who would want to participate in that kind of discussion?
ā€œ[A]s we know, there are known knowns—there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns—that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don’t know we don’t know.ā€ā€”Donald Rumsfeld, 2002

Re: Best of Don The Con

318
Tradehunter wrote: Mon Jun 03, 2024 2:30 am its obvious
You ain't Don The Fe-Lon, and this ain't the U.S. State of Georgia.šŸ˜‰
ā€œ[A]s we know, there are known knowns—there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns—that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don’t know we don’t know.ā€ā€”Donald Rumsfeld, 2002

Re: Best of Don The Con

320
Tradehunter wrote: Mon Jun 03, 2024 2:33 am But you are a shill.
Thanks for more dunghill.šŸ’©šŸ’©

34
These users thanked the author JohnnyRy for the post:
Jedidiah
ā€œ[A]s we know, there are known knowns—there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns—that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don’t know we don’t know.ā€ā€”Donald Rumsfeld, 2002