naluvs01 wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 2:54 am
Since you asked nicely: EMA's 8, 45, 200. The 45 EMA represents where price is on the Daily and the 200 represents the weekly. The reason I don't use MTF is because it recalculates to price action. These EMA's are the closest to it and don't change. And if you add the PSAR (settings .02/.1), it is a phenomenal strategy.
The only thing I can think of it could be the natural fractal recalculating/repainting. The code seems to be okay.Vere wrote: Fri Dec 20, 2019 7:09 pm
its all same setting, only fractal price dffrnt, i change btwen close and hi/low
I three times changed the text messages, but alas this all that I was able modicum as the translate with the help interpreter) this too difficult it turned out for interpreter, from moreover ' difficult, and You on this upset, not accept close, just the problem translation....naluvs01 wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 2:54 am
Since you asked nicely: EMA's 8, 45, 200. The 45 EMA represents where price is on the Daily and the 200 represents the weekly. The reason I don't use MTF is because it recalculates to price action. These EMA's are the closest to it and don't change. And if you add the PSAR (settings .02/.1), it is a phenomenal strategy.
of course would was would quite with steeply, if would set of indie and pattern, but I fear even ask, and the that the again not so will translate))))) 
THX for ur time checking the indi,mrtools wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 2:58 am The only thing I can think of it could be the natural fractal recalculating/repainting. The code seems to be okay.
I have this one it's pretty much the same just a little more optimized code wise.Vere wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 8:36 am
THX for ur time checking the indi,
btw, do you have similiar indi like fractal breakout??
once again THX for ur time
Real Results with FX Power – One Week of Consist
