The issue is not about any trades now being shown and justified in the after thought manner associated with the intellectually defective style of the undereducated, and I do not think that is @ImpLaNTs point. Rather, the issue is more in line with a post that @Jackson Doh made on the thread.

The issue is in fact in the promise of Orbit the Tool:

A) The Shape trades the news.

B) The Shape trades the lead into and exit out of the FLE.

C) The Shape trades the change in CMD1 up and down.

The Shape does so 100/100 times correct. It is not therefore, an academic question rather it is an empirical assertion. The promise stands at all times and there is nothing left in trading that has proved more difficult to traders since electronic trading began than the three conditions above. So that is issue, and of course in the minds of the undereducated or the intellectually destitute the false equivalency now being made in very childish terms and suggestions well outside of the issue somehow justifies the false equivalency a cohort of individuals have engaged in. But @ImpLaNT remains correct at least that is how formal logic will see it regardless. The cohort is therefore wrong no matter what. Now to be clear, beyond this comment there is nothing more to be said, rather I would expect that this fundamental correction here made, would be adopted except where the campaign is driven by irrational coping behaviour. It is really that simple if you are as educated as I am.

The Crow (_-_) Inverted: Does not like under informed posturing.

PS: I am writing stuff that contains the mathematical derivation of the model underpinning the tool that makes the assertions above possible and certain. It would be interesting to hear lucid comments from the cohort so vocal about nothing more than that formal logic justifies the object of their attacks 100%. Lets hear you Ok? To see your depth sometimes.