A few points to note in actual trades below
In screenshot A we see an indication that reads a “reversal” in the current cyclic trend in Gold. But within moments we see screenshot B reindicate a pullback up (the initial indication), this is part of what we call edge conditions. Which imply the various circumstances in which the behaviour of price describes trading at some extreme of the space in which it is trading. In this case, price is at the edge of negative space and persistence up would transform the space to positive space (low pivots translate higher) from negative space we had before (high pivots translate lower).This sort of flicking is associated with the intermittency that follows such conditions due to what chaos math calls Initial Conditions (the butterfly effect) at such edges. Intermittency is pervasive in market space therefore, but in the Cloud Version we have a setup that informs a user more directly about what is going on and how to control for this specific fluctuation type and the associated trade action.
In the prototype you use your eyes and your understanding of the play to control for trade action. Please see the new Orbit Trade Book page 14 for details. Note that an important quality of Orbit is that it times changes accurately and so we should exercise patience at these sort of points (when we become unsure and might make a trade error do NOT trade) – because when there is a final resolution of intermittency the signals will be firm and there will still be enough time to enter trade safely very profitably. Do not be jumpy in trading Orbit be patient – DO NOT FORGET THAT WHEN ORBIT FINDS THE TREND IT WILL BE FOR MANY, MANY PIPS ALL YOURS IN RISK FREE - SPACE. Do not think as you did before when you were trading risky space. Then you were blind, not knowing were the market is going is torture yes, but that is no excuse to make a mistake in Orbit -----> the Pips are ahead and in risk-free space.
So you see patience has a calculated meaning in Chaos. YOU WAIT when not sure. Because you must accept that Intermittency is a property of dynamical systems and it causes indicators to flip back and forth so it is not a matter of gaining some lookback that will NEVER flicker it is a matter of knowing the fluctuant type and the topologies in which it occurs and by calculation, timing it for shape. Then using information for that shape to calculate the amount of distortion required in that space and therefore time the various actions. Not simple but that is what we did for the more robust Cloud Version. The algorithm there will completely hang MT4 and there are many, many more like it. So not possible in the current prototype. Please see the trade book.
(-_-)
For the prototype what did I do? See my trade below but do not use my entry (as you can see no signal was changed to you, but to me the signal was the pivot), but does it mean it is all over and I can go to sleep? No this is like piloting a take off and we watch the pattern of pivoting and read the weights. Because as a matter of fact page 12 says that we need a lower low + lower high to confirm Phaselock + Risk-Free space as you can see on the simple drawing which is in fact a serious calculation. So looking at the KSO we were at amplitude by the spike on which I entered and therefore at a limiting extreme and as such we MUST fall. So as you see @ImpLaNT I chose my combination of signals to be what tells me an extreme to enter because I depend on the logic not the signals. The logic says Price = Extreme = Inverse On. And I know the logic and therefore, I am better than any indicator because of that. However, learning is step by step so keep with the indicators if you are new to chaos. When you master you can vary. It is a science it can be learned step by step because deterministic trading is not random. Random systems can NEVER EVER be mastered. You wanted to know and for me to show you how I enter trades (you said it was more important to you than any mathematical concept that I render). That is one example but it all depends where we are in space so I can vary the logic by topology of course our nested or inductive signalling structure is excellent and should be used by new comers to Mandelbrotian randomness. Once risk-free space is confirmed I trade the normal signal (nested) structure because does not take my blood pressure up like this (yes I still do not believe and lack the confidence to see I am trading the Grail. But I trade well by it anyway and it works). The moral is that it is logic that gives you an edge even within an implementation that is correct 100/100 times so you make more money than less expert traders. Because we do not trade random space your income from trading should mirror more closely your trading skills. By the way in this case as you can see from the last screenshot I am over 1000 points in Good money (almost the same as Orbit 1542 points, so I reset my stop to breakeven 1902 price turned at 1904.52. My economics is good very good and done coolly too. I am trading to make money by growing an account and so I find the certainty of chaos the best environment to do so and you can see nothing here really depends on confluence because nothing in this complex mathematical space justifies confluence and it would be a waste of time making a special provision for it because you would introduce errors into the space that way and at exponential rates of change errors multiply at exponential speeds – do not forget the equation of markets describe a parabola and price behaves as such.