ForexFux wrote: Fri Oct 06, 2023 6:45 pm
This happens really often. Look at the 3 A(3) arrows and the white zig zags in my screenshot.
Not sure what you are doing? Are you trying to find a pattern of play that works from history or are you trying to understand where price is going right now? But everything you see occur often enough so that part of the problem of reading patterns outside of the pattern is that it is hard to attribute consistent meaning to anything. Which is why the notion of the
Strange Attractor is critical. If you say where are we, you become more focused on what is going on. If for instance at a top you thinking a turn down is possible and you look to Screenface and ask so what are you saying? Still up or down?
Price in the sort of mathematics we have applied is
inductive -----> it does not just turn. No, whether NFP or
No news turns (which are rather more than will be the statistical case if markets were random or news driven). This is why Orbit signaling is
inductive, it follows the pattern. So a) try to read by the strange attractor (it is an important structure to observe in trading), and b) Check with screenface and c) express calculated patience, you are not just waiting for a trigger it is a trigger certain, however always keep in mind that IT IS for a 6n range (point to point). which must always complete. It is the safest way to trade and most profitable too.
When you think about history we see that the "shapes" price form in history (to the last second) are the same. But in live trading the manner of construction is NEVER repeated ever. Price repaints to make them look the same IN HISTORY. That is why "price patterns" is a problem to trade live as an example. They are not recognizable in live trades because in live trades you are observing a single point not even a bar, just a point and this affects you whether you know it or not. To be correct only reading where you are on the attractor and what price is doing amounts to a logical response to market feedback again as an example. In a case where you have the signals and once you see them its a kill. The way to measure expected range is topological and we do it by Semaphores, i.e. from what you trade (pivots w, y, a, g, h) or
domain to what you trade (w, y, a, g, h)
co-domain. That this dynamical exchange of sets (
Semaphores), is called a
bijection in mathematics and this is important to know because it is an equation in analogue and it
MUST COMPLETE.
But lets just say that so far I am merely blabbing and wasting your time and all you were talking about was simpler than all that razz up there and all you wanted to find out was the so called zero command, why not ask @ R&T to show you videos and people pick the pattern from observation? Just a thought.
(_-_)
