The Washington Post (and all other media):
Trump proposes U.S. ‘take over’ Gaza

https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/po ... video.html

One has to admit that the guy is very vigorous.
Is a second Afghanistan coming?
(even if it is much smaller)

General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
32 min ·
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 06.02.25 were approximately /
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 06.02.25
personnel ‒ about 845310 (+1240) persons,
tanks ‒ 9965 (+18) units,
armored combat vehicles ‒ 20737 (+16) units,
artillery systems ‒ 22753 (+46) units,
MLRS ‒ 1271 (+2) units,
anti-aircraft systems ‒ 1055 (+2) units,
aircraft ‒ 369 (+0) units,
helicopters – 331 (+0) units,
UAV operational-tactical level – 24185 (+83),
cruise missiles – 3054 (+0),
warships – 28 (+0) units,
submarines – 1 (+0) units,
vehicles and fuel tanks – 36211 (+133) units,
special equipment – ​​3737 (+2)

Uncomfortable Truth: Russia Advances MUCH FASTER Than Reported (10×) | Negotiation | Ukraine Update




Russia Is Dragging Belarus Into The ConflictThe US Peace Plan Will Be Published MS 2025.02.06

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2 ... sian-soil/

General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
1 hour ·
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 07.02.25
personnel ‒ about 846650 (+1340) persons,
tanks ‒ 9975 (+10) units,
armored combat vehicles ‒ 20755 (+18) units,
artillery systems ‒ 22785 (+32) units,
MLRS ‒ 1271 (+0) units,
anti-aircraft systems ‒ 1056 (+1) units,
aircraft ‒ 369 (+0) units units,
helicopters – 331 (+0) units,
UAV operational-tactical level – 24301 (+116),
cruise missiles – 3054 (+0),
warships – 28 (+0) units,
submarines – 1 (+0) units,
vehicles and fuel tanks – 36307 (+96) units,
special equipment – ​​3738 (+1)

vvFish wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:52 am
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2 ... sian-soil/
Screenshot_405.png

Russia "may have".......

moey_dw wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 5:55 pm Russia "may have".......

That article is full mainstream sh*t. Exactly as you pointed out the "May Have" killed it. I love when they use "Highly likely" as well.
"According to Kiril Sazonov". Kiril Sazonov is a politic analyst who is PRETENDING to fight in the conflict. Forbes making headlines based on 1 "May Have" source.
But it seems its working for the sheep. I mean I don't blame anyone, its easier just to sit around and consume than to use their brains.

doolfrews wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 6:21 pm That article is full mainstream sh*t. Exactly as you pointed out the "May Have" killed it. I love when they use "Highly likely" as well.

This

Exactly my point I mean seriously?? After all the disgusting lies of the mainstream news how can people actually still quote or even rely on this such dangerous sources for their news still lol..... even matt drudge mysteriously became left leaning years ago and everyone ditched that bumhole of a site

Zelensky desperate measures, orders counter offensives all over the battlefronts but all come to nought in quick order.

50 Ukr vehicles lost and a huge body count in Kursk, all over within hours.

Similar results on the frontlines in Ukr.

Zelensky aware US aid drying up, EU not able to cover, Ukr army collapsing, prospect of Ukr joining NATO gone, no hope of western troops joining battle and Trump looming to force a deal on Zelensky which looks like surrender.





Second Day Of Ukrainian Offensive Begins Trump's Peace Plan Leaked Military Summary 2025.02.07




NATO Could NOT Win a WAR w/ Russia

moey_dw wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:54 pm Exactly my point I mean seriously??

Whether it's true or not, it is good news because no one died.
Probably the Kremlin wouldn't use the same missile twice
because the first explosion was spectacular enough and
the missile is a prototype so it could make some mistake,
which wouldn't be good before the White House - Kremlin talks...