General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
1 hour
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy
from 24.02.22 to 30.09.25 were approximately /
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy
from 24.02.22 to 30.09.25
personnel – about / about 1110560 (+970) persons
tanks / tanks – 11222 (+4) from
troop-carrying AFVs – 23291 (+1) from
artillery systems / artillery systems – 33311 (+27) from
MLRS / MLRS – 1505 (+1) from
anti-aircraft systems / anti-aircraft systems – 1224 (+0) from
aircraft / aircraft – 427 (+0) from
helicopters – 346 (+1)
UAV operational-tactical level – 65303 (+301)
cruise missiles – 3790 (+0)
warships – 28 (+0)
submarines – 1 (+0)
vehicles and fuel tanks – 63241 (+90)
special equipment – ​​3979 (+0)

Missiles are back to the top of the agenda and once again the delusion of the west is exposed. Zelensky is crying out for an upgrade, those himars and attacms were shit, so were the storm shadows and the scalps, the sanpan or whatever it was called disappeared before the fuse was ever lit, same as the flamingos.

What Zelensky really needs are tomahawks. Oh yes, even Kellogg thinks that would be a great idea, but the snag there is that they have only just recently developed a ground based launch system for them and there aren’t that many. Plenty of ship launch ones but Ukraine doesn't have any ships.

So numbers are going to be small, not even as many as the 150 taurus that never got the ok from Germany. And there’s the problem, for the last few days Russia has been decreasing the number of long range drones fired but has increased the number of cruise and ballistic missiles so 60 one day and over 40 the next at the last count. So Russia has probably fired off as many missiles in 2 days as the US can send tomahawks in total.

Russia must have fired off many hundreds over the last 2 years so you would have to wonder what 50 to 100 tomahawks are going to do against Russia? This is all nonsense, none of these ‘wonder weapons’ have been anything of the sort and the same will be for tomahawks. It escalates without actually doing anything of the kind and Russia will just respond with bigger and better Oreshnik strikes on Ukraine.

This is not about escalation by the west because it’s the Russians who have escalation dominance so rather it’s about just trying to prolong the conflict.

Scott Ritter in an interview yesterday explained that the US won’t supply tomahawk missiles to Ukraine because it can’t. Tomahawks need total US input with specialist instrumentation and equipment to trigger them let alone targeting, Ukraine will never be given the equipment and codes to actually use them themselves (only a very few countries such as the UK have and even then are under strict US control). Tomahawks are nuclear capable, Ritter is saying the Kellogg statement is bluff because Trump would need congressional permission before even starting the process of transferring tomahawks to Ukraine.


Meanwhile, what should European NATO countries do next? Shoot down Russian planes or capture or blockade Russian shipping in the Baltic, decisions, decisions.

The US seems to be joining the fun saying that Russian planes are getting close to US air space in Alaska, not surprising given that just 50 miles separates Russia from the US.

The Europeans don't need to do anything just yet though, there's still a few Ukrainians to go before the ‘last Ukrainian’ and then they just need to find the next sucker country. Maybe Moldova or Romania or even Finland?


Mark Sleboda | US & Europe Are 'Dying For World War 3: US Directs Strikes On Russian Territory





Trump, Vance, Kellogg test Putin's restraint and Russia's Red Line

Trump and Hegseth's meeting of generals turned out to be nothing but a rally call to the faithful with no new important messaging at all. Trump was surprised that he didn’t get a loud rousing cheer as he walked on stage like when meeting the rank and file.

The reason for that, as Trump should have known, was that generals swear an oath first to the constitution and then to the chief. They’re always supposed to remain non-political.

Meanwhile the EU is really starting to shit itself as according to a Politico article the EU is unsure how to respond to a Russia that is ‘increasingly risk-seeking’, this is referring to the bullshit stories of Russian drone incursions (really EU false flag ops) and then Trump saying ‘sure shoot down Russian planes if you want’, but they (the EU) realising that Trump doesn’t actually have their back if they do.

When you look at that tangled web of manipulation and outright lies it gets easier to see how world wars get started.

Alarm bells should be ringing when you see a story doesn't add up. A winning side doesn't agitate the situation with a view to escalate it, the losing side does.

The EU is starting to understand that by their own failed dirty tricks and manipulative plans, they are now facing their own existential threat and have nothing left to fight it off with, no armies, no equipment, and no money.

Zelensky is saying that Putin is about to open up hostility against western Europe but that would make no sense at all, Putin is doing fine as is and he’s not stupid. Putin would have nothing to gain by encouraging the opening up another front against a new enemy but Zelensky has everything to gain, if only he can convince an EU country to attack Russia then he might survive this war though the rest of the world wouldn’t.

The EU has bet the farm on the Ukraine war and is going to lose it. EU countries already have massive debt and the only way out is more debt but there is only so much the bond markets will carry before they crash. Add to that the rising political problems for the EU globalists in power from an increasingly popular populist movement and they could be on the verge of doing something really very desperate and stupid.

Van der Crazy just said in a speech that ‘because the Russians are losing and their economy is about to collapse, the time is right for a decisive action on our part’.

Van der Clown is also now proposing turning the EU from a trade organisation into a military one, we could all see that coming, a EU army funded by new EU issued bonds (on top of the already over burdened individual state bonds).

We can only hope the whole EU shitshow will come crashing down before any of this can become a reality.

Not to be overshadowed Zelensky now threatens he will soon be able to make deep strikes up to 2,500km (the exact max range of the US tomahawk missile) so either more bullshit or the actual start of WW3?
Cunning new plan put forward by the EU idiots to build a wall to keep the Russians out, brilliant. But it can’t be built in Ukraine without a ceasefire so will need to be built err, behind the Ukrainians. So the Ukrainians will have the Russians in front of them and a wall behind them, yeah, brilliant.

Latest military and geopolitical analysis from 3 retired western military service men in 2 videos.

RUSSIA Has NO VOTE Ukraine Gets to Decide (they do) /Lt Col Daniel Davis & Steve Jermy




Col Doug Macgregor: Europe No Longer at Peace w/Russia

General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
5 hours
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy
from 24.02.22 to 01.10.25 were approximately /
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy
from 24.02.22 to 01.10.25
personnel – about / about 1111480 (+920) persons
tanks / tanks – 11223 (+1) from
troop-carrying AFVs – 23294 (+3) from
artillery systems / artillery systems – 33324 (+13) from
MLRS / MLRS – 1505 (+0) from
anti-aircraft systems / anti-aircraft systems – 1224 (+0) from
aircraft / aircraft – 427 (+0) from
helicopters – 346 (+0)
UAV operational-tactical level – 65552 (+249)
cruise missiles – 3790 (+0)
warships – 28 (+0)
submarines – 1 (+0)
vehicles and fuel tanks – 63274 (+33)
special equipment – ​​3979 (+0)

General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
2 hours
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy
from 24.02.22 to 02.10.25 were approximately /
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy
from 24.02.22 to 02.10.25
personnel – about / about 1112460 (+980) persons
tanks / tanks – 11224 (+1) from
troop-carrying AFVs – 23296 (+2) from
artillery systems / artillery systems – 33336 (+12) from
MLRS / MLRS – 1507 (+2) from
anti-aircraft systems / anti-aircraft systems – 1224 (+0) from
aircraft / aircraft – 427 (+0) from
helicopters – 346 (+0)
UAV operational-tactical level – 65823 (+271)
cruise missiles – 3790 (+0)
warships – 28 (+0)
submarines – 1 (+0)
vehicles and fuel tanks – 63303 (+29)
special equipment – ​​3979 (+0)

Bigger and better false flag operations are planned for the Ukraine conflict as the end comes into view.

Russia says they have intel that Ukraine and Poland are planning an attack on a Polish infrastructure site and will blame the Russians.

The US think tank ISW says that the Russians are saying this because they’re actually planning the attack themselves but will put the blame on Ukraine and Poland.

But why would Russia stage such an attack? Because they are losing the war and are desperate to drag NATO in, no wait. Because they are winning the war and are desperate to drag NATO in, no wait. Because they are probing to see how far they can push NATO before they join the war on the opposition's side, oh.

But why would Ukraine stage such an attack? Because they are losing the war and are desperate to drag NATO in.

You have to step aside and think if any scenario makes sense and who really benefits as a result of any action for a clue as to who staged it.

The side winning will not want to upset the status quo, the side losing will.

There may be something to the ‘probing’ claim as the WSJ claim Trump has authorised long range strikes into Russia which could lead to Russian strikes on western weapons logistic hubs in Poland. (See ‘supply lines’ linked video below)

Side note from the video; ‘instead of minutes to evacuate a casualty from the battlefield it’s now taking days’, speaking of disruptions to Ukrainian supply lines.

So who is actually winning the conflict? Thanks to huge doses of propaganda there seems to be a lot of doubt.

If you’re unsure, watch the 2 year timelapse video in the X post from Clement Molin below of the main battlefront in the Donetsk and decide for yourself (try @ x1.5 speed).

Reminder that by far the main bulk of Ukraine forces are concentrated on this battlefront and there’s not much in the way of defensive positions behind them should they fall.

Reminder too that the Russians only advance once the Ukraine forces decide to stop reinforcing troops stuck in a Russian made cauldron and are retreating.

The Russians do this because their main objective is to destroy the Ukrainian army man by man. Once the army collapses the territory can be taken and there will be no insurgency afterwards such as happened to the US in Iraq and Afghanistan because there's no one left behind to stage it.

Slow but very effective.

This should also be a warning to Ukraine and the west that Russia fully intends to keep everything they take.

And in other news Zelensky has revealed that due to the Russians shelling themselves in the Zap nuclear power plant they have had to stop operations and switch on diesel generators because of damage to the cooling towers.

Zelensky can’t explain why the Russians are so silly as to keep shelling themselves but it means that the power plant really should be handed over to the Ukrainians by the international atomic authorities as soon as possible.


And ex AFU army chief Zaluzhny returns with a new published article 2 years after his last one on how Ukraine could win the war using laser robots or some such. Now he tells us how Ukraine can stop Russia from winning, not quite the same thing as Ukraine winning but never mind.

And the solution he comes up with is …. you guessed it, long range cruise missiles (presumably tomahawks and lots of them).

That will put the Russians on the back foot and leave them quaking in their boots.

Long range missiles and short range UAVs for the battlefield and, same as his 2023 piece, robots on the ground (presumably to replace the men they don’t have), plus the need to “invent new systems and measures to improve troop survivability”.

And that’s pretty much the whole article that’s loaded with huge doses of waffle. Read it in the link below.




https://zn.ua/eng/innovation-as-core-of ... h-war.html


Why Supply Lines are Collapsing in Ukraine

US will provide Kyiv with intelligence for strikes deep into Russian territory
https://www.wsj.com/world/u-s-to-provid ... _lead_pos1

General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
3 hours
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy
from 24.02.22 to 03.10.25 were approximately /
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 03.10.25
Due to the constant receipt of updated intelligence data, there was a need to
adjust some items of the enemy's total losses - artillery systems, MLRS, air defense systems,
OTR UAVs, cruise missiles, motor vehicles and special equipment.
The total figure has been adjusted, and losses per day are presented in the usual mode.
personnel – about 1,113,430 (+970) persons tanks – 11,225 (+1) troop-carrying AFVs – 23,297
(+1) artillery systems – 33,413 (+13) MLRS – 1,514 (+1) anti-aircraft systems – 1,222 (+0)
aircraft – 427 (+0) helicopters – 346 (+0) UAV operational-tactical level – 66,093
(+273) cruise missiles – 3,793 (+0) warships – 28 (+0) submarines – 1 (+0)
vehicles and fuel tanks – 63325 (+44)
special equipment – ​​3970 (+0)

Interesting information coming out on the tomahawk story is that the adaptations for ground launchers are so few they will not be let out of the US so talk of tomahawks to Ukraine must be false.

Ukraine is not capable of firing the sea or air launch versions and it may be that the whole tomahawk story is misdirection. Trump has signalled a blanket approval for long range missile launches but they still need US targeting so no hitting the Kremlin or anything like.

That must annoy Zelensky because he knows he can’t destroy Russia’s oil infrastructure with a handful of missiles, he’s really only interested in decapitation strikes on the Russian high command, expect Zelensky to start whinging again soon.

Some believe the missiles in question are not tomahawks but are the German Taurus missiles or perhaps the new US Barracuda missile.

Ground gained by the Russians has dropped off over the last 2 months from the 600sqkm per month as the Russian army has moved up to 4 Ukrainian cities, Pokrovsk, Konstaninovka, Siversk and Kupinsk.

Pokrovsk is near completely surrounded, latest reports say no vehicle movement is safe along the supply road and Russian troops are now in the centre of the city. Konstaninovka and Russian troops have arrived on the outskirts, similar in Siversk and in Kupiansk Russian troops have also taken over the centre of the city.

It wasn't that long ago that the SMO could only tackle one city at a time.

The clown Macron has seized a private tanker shipping Russia oil. He says drones might have been launched from it, he is going to release it soon and says this is a good way to harass Putin.

He knows he's talking nonsense but it's ‘strategic ambiguity ‘ (he learnt that off Trump), he thinks he's being clever but really he's just being an idiot as usual.

The Russians will just form convoys with military escorts and dare the west to try it, they won't and so, having manoeuvered themselves into this position, will just end up looking like cowards.

The EU meeting in Denmark breaks up with no agreement on anything as usual. One third wants war, one third wants to steal Russia’s billions, and one third wants to go back to buying Russian oil.

Reminder that Russia is losing, they are unable to take any territory on the battlefield while taking horrendous casualties. While at the same time Russia is marching on Berlin and is an existential threat to all of western Europe.

Neither is true, Russia is not an existential threat to western Europe, due to western politicians and their utter folly Russia is now an existential threat to NATO and the EU.

That’s what happens when you pick fights and lose. And good riddance to both organisations who started with good intentions but were taken over by globalist retards and set on a course of forever expansion in classic Bond villain style.

A note on accusations of Russian provocation, the drone provocations look to be either false flag ops by the west or the result of Ukrainian electronic interference sending the drones off course, common sense says that provoking NATO to join the hot war is not actually in Russia’s interests but is most definitely in Ukraine's.

There may be more to it though as discussed in the video below, maybe the Russians are trying to trigger NATO countries to demand more supplies of weapons for themselves and so diverting them from Ukraine.

And the accusations of cyber attacks may well be true with Russia seeking to hack western logistics of weapons supplies to Ukraine, especially through Poland’s road and rail links.


Russia’s Aggression on NATO Airspace




Trump closer to deep strikes inside Russia

General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
2 hours
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy
from 24.02.22 to 04.10.25 were approximately /
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy
from 24.02.22 to 04.10.25
personnel – about / about 1114380 (+950) persons
tanks / tanks – 11226 (+1) from
troop-carrying AFVs – 23298 (+1) from
artillery systems / artillery systems – 33428 (+15) from
MLRS / MLRS – 1515 (+1) from
anti-aircraft systems / anti-aircraft systems – 1222 (+0) from
aircraft / aircraft – 427 (+0) from
helicopters – 346 (+0)
UAV operational-tactical level – 66543 (+450)
cruise missiles – 3803 (+10)
warships – 28 (+0)
submarines – 1 (+0)
vehicles and fuel tanks – 63398 (+73)
special equipment – ​​3971 (+1)