Re: WW3 Countdown
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2025 7:14 pm
The drone wars continue. Russia is sending over 500 drones and missiles every night while western analysis says the Russians are able to produce over 500 per day (and increasing) and are the much improved long-range drones now with jet engines and able to carry 4 x the payload of earlier versions.
Ukraine have gone back to claiming they are shooting them all down but video footage would dispute those claims.
Meanwhile Ukraine is also firing off several hundred drones into Russia currently but they are much less sophisticated and the majority are being shot down by Russia's very advanced multi-layered air defence systems.
The EU are working on their 19th sanctions package, this time they mean business and will be targeting the … err, German NordStream pipeline that the US already blew up.
And once again the EU will try an oil price cap, didn't work last time, seems it's difficult for a consumer to set the price charged by the producer for some reason.
NATO chief Mark Rutte calls for a 400% increase in air defences saying that Russia will be ready to attack NATO in 5 years.
Not a day goes by without Mark Rutte calling for an increase in something or other but the truth is that EU countries haven't done anything to increase defence budgets let alone start any kind of mobilisation which tells you all you need to know about what they really think of the actual 'Russian threat'.
The real question though is why would Russia even want to attack NATO countries?
Western Europe is natural resources poor, over burdened with debt, has very serious population demographic problems and not far from civil wars, many countries are deindustrialising, and the list goes on for reasons why Russia would not want to touch western Europe with a barge pole.
There's only one reason why Russia would want to attack western Europe and that's if western Europe attacked Russia first, which is why NATO really must get the hell out of Ukraine.
BTW, isn't odd that those who warned against involving Ukraine in a war with Russia are called anti-Ukrainian while those who cheer on Ukraine's destruction and encourage their continuation in the conflict are called pro-Ukrainian.
More commentators now saying Russia needs to, and will, continue towards the Dnieper river and top and tail that by taking Kiev and Odessa. Kiev because Russia needs to remove the Zelensky regime from the capital and Odessa to stop the flow of weapons and equipment coming in by sea.
Besides the destruction of Ukraine the next biggest loser in this conflict will be NATO which is also likely to face destruction.
The US will be done propping up and paying for western Europe's basic defence needs. After 70 years of peace now that the tide has turned everyone can see western Europe has been swimming naked.
The world can see the complete ineffectiveness of NATO to the point where all those dependant on it have started shouting out that “NATO is the greatest defence org in the history of the world”. As always, try to cover up a damning truth with a lie.
.
Scott Ritter : How Soon Will Ukraine Collapse?
Ukraine have gone back to claiming they are shooting them all down but video footage would dispute those claims.
Meanwhile Ukraine is also firing off several hundred drones into Russia currently but they are much less sophisticated and the majority are being shot down by Russia's very advanced multi-layered air defence systems.
The EU are working on their 19th sanctions package, this time they mean business and will be targeting the … err, German NordStream pipeline that the US already blew up.
And once again the EU will try an oil price cap, didn't work last time, seems it's difficult for a consumer to set the price charged by the producer for some reason.
NATO chief Mark Rutte calls for a 400% increase in air defences saying that Russia will be ready to attack NATO in 5 years.
Not a day goes by without Mark Rutte calling for an increase in something or other but the truth is that EU countries haven't done anything to increase defence budgets let alone start any kind of mobilisation which tells you all you need to know about what they really think of the actual 'Russian threat'.
The real question though is why would Russia even want to attack NATO countries?
Western Europe is natural resources poor, over burdened with debt, has very serious population demographic problems and not far from civil wars, many countries are deindustrialising, and the list goes on for reasons why Russia would not want to touch western Europe with a barge pole.
There's only one reason why Russia would want to attack western Europe and that's if western Europe attacked Russia first, which is why NATO really must get the hell out of Ukraine.
BTW, isn't odd that those who warned against involving Ukraine in a war with Russia are called anti-Ukrainian while those who cheer on Ukraine's destruction and encourage their continuation in the conflict are called pro-Ukrainian.
More commentators now saying Russia needs to, and will, continue towards the Dnieper river and top and tail that by taking Kiev and Odessa. Kiev because Russia needs to remove the Zelensky regime from the capital and Odessa to stop the flow of weapons and equipment coming in by sea.
Besides the destruction of Ukraine the next biggest loser in this conflict will be NATO which is also likely to face destruction.
The US will be done propping up and paying for western Europe's basic defence needs. After 70 years of peace now that the tide has turned everyone can see western Europe has been swimming naked.
The world can see the complete ineffectiveness of NATO to the point where all those dependant on it have started shouting out that “NATO is the greatest defence org in the history of the world”. As always, try to cover up a damning truth with a lie.
.
Scott Ritter : How Soon Will Ukraine Collapse?