Re: МТ4 Trading Systems: TRADE EXPRESS

101
A little more about Fibonacci
Fibonacci projections:
Fibonacci projection is a measurement from 2 points on a chart, and the range between these two price points is then 'predicted' in the future to be used as support and resistance.
You only need 2 Price on the schedule to determine the Fibonacci projection, and make sure that you measure it in the same direction as the price-share trend on your card.
Fibonacci extension:
A Fibonacci is a measurement tool, using 3 points on a chart, and the most commonly used technique for determining profit-target figures among day traders.
We will use 3 price points on the chart, calling them 'A', 'B', and 'C'.
The Fibonacci extension is going to measure the distance from point 'A' to 'B' and then spreads from the deepest point of growth at point 'c'
The theory behind Fibonacci lies in the fact that if the price went from 'A' to 'B' before, then most likely it will carry the same amount in the future.
Bonus: in addition to measuring the price range from point 'A' to 'b', and then projection that the price range in the future, we can also measure the time it took to move from point 'A' to 'B' and then extend this point to the future from point "c".
This is called Fibonacci extension, and is a very popular tool for trading-management.
Fibonacci Target Area:
Professional traders use Fibonacci levels, forecasts and extensions in various ways, but the most effective way is to combine the Fibonacci projections and extensions into a 'spectrum' that can be used as the target company of the transaction.
Combine the protrusions and Fibonacci extensions on the profit-target zone to manage the trade as a professional.
Attachments


Re: МТ4 Trading Systems: TRADE EXPRESS

103
There are two powerful tools for graphical analysis, combining both price and time.
Andrews pitchfork and spiral. Perhaps there are others. The main question is how to use them correctly.
Forks are relatively easy to build. They are tied to already formed extremes and then do not change their position.
The binding to the three extremes as a triangle of rigidity does not allow distortion of the pitchfork in the future.
The difficulty in choosing the right extremes.
The spiral is also attached to extremes. But to two. To the tops of one wave. On the one hand, it's relatively easy to choose the right anchor points.
One wave has a beginning and an end. On the other hand, it is difficult to choose the correct compression scale for the graph. At different scales, the trajectory of the spiral is slightly different.
For the rigidity of the construction, it is necessary to select the third point.
In the descriptions of the winphi program that Fisher uses, there is a parameter for the spiral that affects the distance between the turns of the spiral.
This leads to the thought - Fisher picked up the scale of the compression of the graph or adjusted the spiral to the chosen scale.
How such a selection to exercise?
The only solution is to select the distance between the turns of the spiral to direct the trajectory of the spiral so that some coil passes through the third known extremum.
As an example, the picture:
The blue spiral is constructed in this way. The first two anchor points are selected in the middle of the descending wave. The trajectory is directed through the highest point of the falling wave - through its beginning.
Undoubtedly, the internal structure of a complex wave is connected with the beginning of this wave. That is, the significant extremes of the internal structure of the wave have a direct connection with the onset of the wave.
Therefore it makes sense as the third point of the "binding" of the spiral to choose the beginning of the highest wave, inside which are the first two points. This is if the construction of the spiral is made somewhere in the middle of the movement. Fisher recommends that you select the first wave or the last wave of the previous movement (or the xABC structure - that is, the correction areas) to bind the start points. With this construction there is no support - there is no third point. You can choose as the third point some significant extremes in the area of ​​the previous wave.
In the example above, the choice of the third point at the beginning of the highest wave directed the trajectory of the spiral and several extremes of the previous motion.
We also observe the interaction of the spiral turns as with Andrews' pitchfork - with Schiff's lines, with RL lines, and with important extremes of previous waves.
We can conclude. Andrews' pitchfork and spiral assume the possession in some degree of art of selecting points of data graphics data binding.
In particular, the pitchfork interacts pretty well with the Elliott wave markup (which is also art). With a spiral a bit simpler. Knowledge of wave counting is not critical.
Attachments

Re: МТ4 Trading Systems: TRADE EXPRESS

104
Fibonacci spiral
Currently, broad market indices are captured in the shrinking Fibonacci spiral (SFS), the result will be seen in the time interval from December 2012 to 2020. Figure 1 shows the value of the currency in the society. The method of providing currency, whether it is a gold standard or simply a declaration, affects mass psychology. Models of mass psychology form various cycles that are associated with progress through long-term periods. The stock market is the most advanced way of possessing the characteristics of human psychologists - from greed to fear, with all their intermediate combinations.
In the 1930s monetary policy based on commodity security made people more honest, which was a direct reflection of this policy. Over time, the economy has become increasingly unstable, higher-order events have increasingly interwoven with the economy and markets.
It should be noted that each cycle has ups and downs, but there are a lot of vertices in the SSF, located within 5% of the given time marks. After them, corrections range from 40% to 50%.
Fibonacci spiral tied to the market
Everything in the world is tied to the coefficient of fi (61.8%), called the golden section. This coefficient is based on a numerical sequence calculated by the Fibonacci mathematician at the end of the 12th century. This sequence consists of numbers, each of which is the sum of the two previous ones: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, etc. The farther the numbers are in this sequence, the closer the division of the previous number into the next will yield a coefficient of 61.8%.
One of the creations of nature is the Fibonacci spiral, which can be constructed starting with squares of smaller size and adding progressively increasing 1.618 times squares, as shown in Figure 1. The spiral can be expanding or contracting. When forming a spiral, the area of each square does not matter, only its length is of interest. In July 2011, it was noted that wide indices of the US stock market began to form the SSF in 1932, with subsequent peaks occurring within 3% of the deviation from the estimated dates, calculated by multiplying the previous part of the SSF by 0.618. Figure 2 shows the data from 1932 to the present day. As the FSS approaches zero, the ratio 0.618 is violated and the individual coefficients that are indicated in Figure 3 need to be taken into account.
A unique feature of the SSF is that for past time marks the coefficient is different, and only then it starts to approach 0.618. Examples are shown in Figure 3. As we approach the time stamp of 2013 and onwards, the coefficient fluctuates around 0.625. For positions in long, it would be safer to close most of them when approaching the next mark, when the coefficient in relation to the previous reaches 60% (0.60).
The markets are seized in the SFS
Several key points about the SFS were identified and presented below:
- The shrinking Fibonacci spiral shows only the vertices in the Dow Jones and S & P 500 indices. The length of subsequent corrections is different. The 1987 timeline fell on an instantaneous collapse, which ended in a few months, followed by a 13-year uptrend. The length of the correction is an undefined value.
- Up to the present time, at each time point on the Fibonacci spiral, each subsequent point has reached a higher high, each increment was less and less in percentage terms than the previous movement. Exceptions were 1966 and 1987 (for example, DJIA = 40 in 1932 to DJIA = 995 in 1966 in relation to any other period under consideration - an increase of about 44 times during this time period).
- After each peak there followed a painful fall not less than 40% -50%.
- Each point of the contracting Fibonacci cycle is more compact than the previous one, and volatility will increase as we approach the singularity point around 2020-2021.- As you approach the singularity point of this cycle, the golden ratio is likely to break, as described in Figure 3.
- This cycle is set in motion by collective human psychology. All events that occur with individuals are personal success or failure, death, birth, accidents, wars, etc. - occur by accident. The tops of the cycle are like cities on the map, the train moves between them at a constant speed. Arrival at the destination takes place at a specific time. What happens to passengers does not affect arrival. This cycle could be stopped by nuclear war, asteroid impact to Earth or another event of the same magnitude. Cycles can be stopped, but we must admit that we are in a big cycle that is nearing completion.
Inside the main SFS
Everyone who is familiar with the nesting doll knows that this doll separates in the middle to accommodate a smaller doll. Following this logic, the existence of large compressible Fibonacci spirals containing smaller ones is possible. But they must be properly coordinated.
The SFS on gold started at a low of $ 253.80 per ounce on June 21, 1999, and grew until February 28, 2008. This is eight years, eight months and seven days. If we take 61.8% of this time (1962 days to July 13, 2013), then gold could either form a peak at this point, or stretch a few more months after this date. This can be thought of as a smaller SFS cycle that operates within a larger SSF.
The use of SFS in the future
The SFS is a cycle that is followed by broad stock market indices since 1932. Each cycle has its own unique rhythm. In this case, the rhythm is based on the Fibonacci principles. When someone can figure out which signal the loop is based on, everything becomes absolutely clear.
It must be remembered that the underlying causes of the SFS lie in currency manipulations that affect many things, including the cost of gold and other goods. This cycle is superior to all others.
Cycles are devoid of emotions. They follow their own rhythm until external forces force them to change their model. Some cycles, for example - the daily biorhythm, are recorded genetically, just like the rotation of the Earth around the Sun. Others, for example - heart rhythm and blood pressure, are subject to external factors, since internal changes are related to external ones (nutrition, music, etc.).
Another important cycle that should be mentioned is Elliott's wave theory, which attempts to identify models and cycles in the stock market and trace their path. In this theory, subjective deviations may exist, because everyone has his own opinion. The rejection must be eliminated, for this one should avoid such things as personal opinion and news. To make it difficult. One way to improve the accuracy of the cycle is to have a statistical base that supports the conclusions.
Statistical analysis is very useful for determining whether the result is (statistically) significant or aberrant. The importance of the results of real testing lies in the fact that it gives a sufficiently large amount of data to calculate the mean value, or the mathematical expectation. Based on the calculated mathematical expectation, it is possible to determine other statistical indicators: mean square error, standard deviation and% CV (covariant deviation, mean square deviation / mean * 100). Based on this, further research can be conducted to confirm or disprove the hypothesis.
Although this cycle may seem logical, and the trade of this model is easily profitable, will it work if everyone knows about it? It is very unlikely that the shrinking Fibonacci spiral will be scientifically recognized before 2020. This cycle is based on the broad masses, carried away by emotions experienced at a particular moment in time, regardless of the degree of their illogicality.
Attachments


Re: МТ4 Trading Systems: TRADE EXPRESS

107
Yashvi Suvarna wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:21 am did you share trading rules or instruction guide with group members to use your above system ?
Yashvanth K.Salian. You are a petty scammer. And the price is 10 USD. You should know everything about your act. You got all the materials and came up with something that was missing and turned to PaiPal for a refund.
  Money back to you will return PayPal. With the project out. Instructions how to earn in the system will be sent only to the members of the group.
Attachments

Re: МТ4 Trading Systems: TRADE EXPRESS

108
amdudus wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 3:56 pm
Yashvanth K.Salian. You are a petty scammer. And the price is 10 USD. You should know everything about your act. You got all the materials and came up with something that was missing and turned to PaiPal for a refund.
  Money back to you will return PayPal. With the project out. Instructions how to earn in the system will be sent only to the members of the group.
Wow, Amdudus is a respected and as contributor flagged member here. Why on earth do people make problems with paypal just because of an unanswered question.

Fibos are found everywhere in nature and just another way of trading, but like Murray Math lines, they are not very reliable on 1-5 m short timeframes to me, because lines every 10-30 pips do not help much. Beware that these structures may change with new highs in main trend, so better trade in trend direction.
Big players mostly push the market where most of the stops are (easy money).
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/five-maj ... ilty-pleas

Re: МТ4 Trading Systems: TRADE EXPRESS

109
Hi guys
As FS always caring and respecting to all its valued members,so expecting all trading community to keep your home (FS) calm,clean,cooperative,helpful and peaceful - no harsh and impolite behavior is allowed,hope all members will be fine with forum rules
if any of you having any complain,problem and or issue,please feel free to consult
Indicator is just a tool.

Use it only if it can benefit you. Leave it if you don't know how to use it optimally.

Re: МТ4 Trading Systems: TRADE EXPRESS

110
friend4you wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 6:49 pm

Wow, Amdudus is a respected and as contributor flagged member here. Why on earth do people make problems with paypal just because of an unanswered question.

Fibos are found everywhere in nature and just another way of trading, but like Murray Math lines, they are not very reliable on 1-5 m short timeframes to me, because lines every 10-30 pips do not help much. Beware that these structures may change with new highs in main trend, so better trade in trend direction.
Big players mostly push the market where most of the stops are (easy money).
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/five-maj ... ilty-pleas
You're right. I would like to draw attention to such aspects (Just a few thoughts in this direction).
The levels of Fibo and Murray, on the one hand, are dynamic variable quantities, on the other hand they are static and unchanged in a separate period of time. Which of them here and now can be trusted, and which one is not?
Therefore, the indicator should take into account dynamics and statics.
Therefore, the coder should know this when writing the indicator.
This happens very rarely. Of all the tried and tested indicators of the Fibo levels, more or less I like the work included in the algorithm of the ZUP indicator.
But here's another question: levels on different timeframes (especially dynamic ones) will behave differently and, very often, give a contradictory picture, which introduces the trader into a stupor.
We look at the picture. What possible action? Where do we enter - BUY or SELL? (Timeframes M1, M5, M30 are shown here).
The trader will choose the path of least resistance, where there is less market noise and errors in the indicator algorithm - a larger timeframe. Is this a mistake or not? We all know that there can be very "logical and correct" mistakes. Dead end? No! We will be helped by other indicators-for example, zones of resistance and support. And the same Fibo and Murray on older timeframes. We look at the picture.
Therefore, there is no way to work on one or two leading indicators.
Consequently, the indications of the same, let us assume very high-quality (as a product) indicators
on different timeframes give a different picture, which leads to gross errors and the discharge of the deposit or tolow-profit trade (at best).
Now a few words about the other.
Technical levels on the charts are built by everyone - both the raw trades and the green beginners. Building support and resistance levels is, perhaps, the first thing a trader who has come to the foreign exchange market learns.
It would seem that there is complicated? I ran the line through the local minimum - that's the level of support for you, at most - and the resistance level is ready. And meanwhile, in this way of construction there is a serious error leading to missed entrances to the transaction or wrong entries.
NOT LEVELS, A ZONES
Let me remind you of the formulation of the price level in the foreign exchange market. The price level is an area or a range of values that the price can not immediately overcome.
Pay attention to the words "area or zone of values", it is in them lies a dirty trick. Drawing a line on the chart through a maximum or a minimum, the trader indicates a specific price value, depending on which trader and determines what happened - breakdown or rollback.
For a better understanding, let's take one of the levels built on the hourly chart. For example, this is the level of resistance in the euro / dollar pair, built at a price of 1.23966.
And now look at the same level in a smaller time interval. As you can see, here the level already works a little differently than on H1.
In the first case, it would be possible to open a deal for sale on the rebound from the resistance level, but the trader did not do this, as the price did not reach the level drawn by him. In the second case, a long transaction would be opened for breakdown of the level. In the best case, it would bring a very small profit or would close on the gapless. At worst, the deal would bring a loss.
But if the resistance was not built in the form of a line, but in the form of an area, then the picture looks quite different. It is clearly seen that the price could not overcome the resistance zone and in this case, the sale transaction on the rebound from the zone would have been opened.
As you can see, using support zones and resistances is more efficient than using simple lines.
FROM WHERE RESISTANCE AND SUPPORT ZONES
Every trader knows that technical analysis is the basis of trading. Ask any trader, he will immediately tell you that the take-profit order should be set at the opposite trend line, and the stop-loss - above or below the previous local maximum or minimum.
And there are millions of such traders in the foreign exchange market. So the resistance and support zones are exactly the places where traders have their take-profits and stop-loss.Accumulations of these orders are very important - when the price reaches them, then hundreds of thousands, for example, stop-loss work almost simultaneously. Accordingly, the price receives an impressive impulse for further movement.
However, traders are not robots, so the values of stop-loss are different, although they are within one narrow range. It is this range that is the support zone or zone of resistance.
It is quite easy to build such price zones. It is enough to find the corresponding price reaction on the chart and to allocate the corresponding zone on it. Flip through the story - you will be sure that the zones you have created really work and are much more effective than the lines drawn on the extremes.
Using a support and resistance zone in the trade, the trader sees the market picture more clearly and does not miss the signal at the opening of the position, unlike the trader who operates with the usual technical levels. A "classic" trader simply will not open a deal, because the price has not reached its level.
Zones of resistance and support will work on any time interval, only their width will differ. Try this method, and you will see that your trade has become even more efficient and more profitable.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests