Thanks for the info, my HomeLAB has gone under considerable changes and is 100% Python based -- now I know why it was so eager to convert to cTrader lol.

I will look into it probably later today or Monday at the latest.
If the indicators port and run smoothly then I will use cTrader -- the last thing that I want to do is spend time fighting code -- I want my daily routine back and if cTrader is the way then so be it.
Best,
Xard777

I had problems today with these indicators:
XU RSI MA1 indicator is too slow, 2375 ms. rewrite the indicator, please

XU_DailyRangeWithBackground indicator is too slow, 2110 ms. rewrite the indicator, please

I asked Gemini 3 Pro to take a look and it came out with these. At least now it works like a train toilet

Pelle wrote: Mon Jan 12, 2026 3:59 am I had problems today with these indicators:
XU RSI MA1 indicator is too slow, 2375 ms. rewrite the indicator, please

XU_DailyRangeWithBackground indicator is too slow, 2110 ms. rewrite the indicator, please

I asked Gemini 3 Pro to take a look and it came out with these. At least now it works like a train toilet

Yeah, I have been seeing the same problems and asking myself do I keep fixing them or do I switch to an alternative and only fix once.
Best,
Xard777

I had abacusAI for a while, but its Gemini 3 Pro was already pulling over 1000 lines of Pinescript translation. I asked Google's antigravity Gemini 3 Pro and the code was shortened to about 350 lines.

I asked abacusAI's Gemini 3 Pro for their opinion on the antigravity Gemini 3 Pro translation, and they said that they liked the antigravity Gemini 3 Pro translation.

I DO NOT believe that abacusAI's Gemini Pro is as good as Google's own antigravity platform

Pelle wrote: Mon Jan 12, 2026 3:59 am I had problems today with these indicators:
XU RSI MA1 indicator is too slow, 2375 ms. rewrite the indicator, please

XU_DailyRangeWithBackground indicator is too slow, 2110 ms. rewrite the indicator, please

I asked Gemini 3 Pro to take a look and it came out with these. At least now it works like a train toilet

I don't know why but your version of Xu Daily range was crashing my MT5.

Vetis wrote: Mon Jan 12, 2026 6:14 am I don't know why but your version of Xu Daily range was crashing my MT5 i fixed it using AI
Edit
I can see now that show only current day range not working correctly but set to one is working

I have MT5 version: 5.00 build 5430

Was it because of the different versions?

Pelle wrote: Mon Jan 12, 2026 6:23 am I have MT5 version: 5.00 build 5430

Was it because of the different versions?

Yes i have beta if they leave this new engine in this MT5 i guess it will cause a lot of troubles but i'm not a coder so maybe i'm wrong. Build 5495

Pelle wrote: Mon Jan 12, 2026 5:22 am I had abacusAI for a while, but its Gemini 3 Pro was already pulling over 1000 lines of Pinescript translation. I asked Google's antigravity Gemini 3 Pro and the code was shortened to about 350 lines.

I asked abacusAI's Gemini 3 Pro for their opinion on the antigravity Gemini 3 Pro translation, and they said that they liked the antigravity Gemini 3 Pro translation.

I DO NOT believe that abacusAI's Gemini Pro is as good as Google's own antigravity platform

Same here. I saw from XARD, Abacus and Cursor, but now I’m fully on Antigravity. Been paying the $20 a month and honestly… it’s miles ahead of everything else I’ve used. Wouldn’t even hesitate to pay more for it. A couple of my buddies switched over too and none of them ever went back.

Honestly, with cTrader I don’t see the hype. I can already push orders to MT5 from my local machine with very low latency, no issues there. The real problem is position tracking — if you run multiple entries on the same pair, MT5 just nets everything into one position and you lose individual ticket control. No matter what you do, it all sits under a single ID.

Other than that, I’ve got zero complaints. I don’t place SL/TP on the broker side anyway — I manage risk externally — so from my side MT5 actually works better. Broker can’t see my stops, execution is fast, and the setup is solid. The only real downside is MT5’s netting model killing multi-position management.

and lastly mt5 is widely available whereas most brokers still dont offer ctrader

Pelle wrote: Mon Jan 12, 2026 6:23 am I have MT5 version: 5.00 build 5430

Was it because of the different versions?

Ok i checked again now with less tabs open an your version is working fine without freezing mt5 so download Pelle version guys he knows how to code so it will be definitely better than my ai crap .

Vetis wrote: Mon Jan 12, 2026 11:20 am Ok i checked again now with less tabs open an your version is working fine without freezing mt5 so download Pelle version guys he knows how to code so it will be definitely better than my ai crap .

I need to correct that I'm not a REAL coder. I just vibe coding