Re: A New Trading Game (chaos game) Played for Money and Played in Risk- Free Space

241
Darkdoji wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 4:44 am A zigzag or semaphore does NOT repaint it recalculates at new lows and highs. That is the pattern of price look at the bijective streams the structure is recursive and you need to understand that bit of dynamic - zigzags do not "repaint". Very important to understand the difference between repaint action and recalculation. Please try to sort that out mentally and also please go back to the arrows, read them and think about their meanings. Take it easy, it is question of orientation and meaning ---> will take more than a day of watching the price action to get to grips with the realities of chaotic fluctuation.

(-_-)
hello, hope your health has improved;;;..

could you please post some entries you made this week? that way avoids unnecessary questions...

you don't need to post much just post a few examples explaining how we should analyze the market and make an entry
These users thanked the author 1337br for the post (total 2):
ffsss, Woodyz


Re: A New Trading Game (chaos game) Played for Money and Played in Risk- Free Space

242
1337br wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 6:13 am hello, hope your health has improved;;;..

could you please post some entries you made this week? that way avoids unnecessary questions...

you don't need to post much just post a few examples explaining how we should analyze the market and make an entry
What I do not understand is, I trade this thing impulse. You do not need to do any analysis you look at the screen it is designed as a mathematical surface (colour convergence divergence to appeal to your intuition) when it is convergent red market is falling and when it is convergent green or Gold market is buying and when it is whishy washy in colour market is ranging. Why are people struggling with this thing? It has clear entry arrows and colour. You wait you will know when to enter and if you miss it enough times you will know more to remember it. It is a new way of trading it does not need analysis --- the tool is always correct so you follow it. That is all. Look Just now I was wondering what the hell was wrong with Gold in a tight up and down bijection going nowhere (anti-persistent series). Then I went to Forex Factory and found out that it was the Fed up to no good going to roil the markets. I do not do news, fundamental or technical anything and trade only at zero risk, that is when Orbit says enter up or down. So I did not know the Fed was in town but reading it on FF I understood the hold up all day, looked at Orbit it said north and I hit it. Simple, price exploded North and I got in for the ride ---> colour was good and inverse on. For a few bucks or any amount of money I bet I make money all the time that is the point without worrying about it. If the market is going 10000 points it starts earlier, etc common sense so I do not see the fuss - I cannot believe this. So I do not understand why people are asking this and that as if trading is rocket science when it is just no more than entry/exit you just trade it when it tells you to trade. Simple - the rocket science is the tool.

The tool is correct so follow that is all.

(-_-)
These users thanked the author Darkdoji for the post:
Mundu19

Re: A New Trading Game (chaos game) Played for Money and Played in Risk- Free Space

243
Please let me just say this ---------> I am not a trader but a chaotist. The work a chaotist does is enough to occupy his days every minute. A chaotist may or may not have interest in actually trading. If you know the math the beauty of its expressions at work and understanding them is more than a reward. So may be I should not make judgement but I have traders I know and work with. They are different from the traders I have met here they go for it. It is simple if it calls trade it. I feel traders must not be afraid with Orbit because if you trade a zero risk tool like the risky mathematics you are used to, you will be confused. Be adventurous just follow it - first on demo. You will see that it is simple. I trade with it loosely all the time and not always as a trader. Today I had an important meeting so was not thinking about markets. I need to make a presentation and that is something I do all the time. So once over with I did a couple of trades and forced to because price was ranging so went to FF saw the problem and traded the Fed move. Cut out of that and now I can plan based on Orbit readings when to enter the new trend.

So frankly I do not understand traders when the tool makes zero risk trades.

(-_-)
These users thanked the author Darkdoji for the post:
Mundu19

Re: A New Trading Game (chaos game) Played for Money and Played in Risk- Free Space

244
Darkdoji wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 8:27 am What I do not understand is, I trade this thing impulse. You do not need to do any analysis you look at the screen it is designed as a mathematical surface (colour convergence divergence to appeal to your intuition) when it is convergent red market is falling and when it is convergent green or Gold market is buying and when it is whishy washy in colour market is ranging. Why are people struggling with this thing? It has clear entry arrows and colour. You wait you will know when to enter and if you miss it enough times you will know more to remember it. It is a new way of trading it does not need analysis --- the tool is always correct so you follow it. That is all. Look Just now I was wondering what the hell was wrong with Gold in a tight up and down bijection going nowhere (anti-persistent series). Then I went to Forex Factory and found out that it was the Fed up to no good going to roil the markets. I do not do news, fundamental or technical anything and trade only at zero risk, that is when Orbit says enter up or down. So I did not know the Fed was in town but reading it on FF I understood the hold up all day, looked at Orbit it said north and I hit it. Simple, price exploded North and I got in for the ride ---> colour was good and inverse on. For a few bucks or any amount of money I bet I make money all the time that is the point without worrying about it. If the market is going 10000 points it starts earlier, etc common sense so I do not see the fuss - I cannot believe this. So I do not understand why people are asking this and that as if trading is rocket science when it is just no more than entry/exit you just trade it when it tells you to trade. Simple - the rocket science is the tool.

The tool is correct so follow that is all.

(-_-)
How does it define that a semaphore has stopped recalculating?
How about screen shooting a few of your next trade entries & exits with a) tick & comment...b) tick & comment....c) tick & comment. etc simply explaining what you're looking at / for and thinking for each step of your trading decisions using the Orbit.
These users thanked the author Woodyz for the post:
WilliamB

Re: A New Trading Game (chaos game) Played for Money and Played in Risk- Free Space

245
Someday I will be able to understand why everyone who programs things related to a lot of calculus and many confluences (more than fifteen). They always put things full of atomic colors and little things. Money may even produce and normally it always costs a lot of dough. And the security that this can still give you seizures but you will be left without catching a single Pokemon.
Attachments
From the domains of my desk and laptop Full of Porn and Charts I call upon the Spiritual Presence and Power of Richard Wyckoff, Jesse Livermore, George Soros and all the Wise in Volume and Standard Deviation to enlighten and make everyone get off their asses and go to study Market Structure, Liquidity Pools and Volume.

Selah


Re: A New Trading Game (chaos game) Played for Money and Played in Risk- Free Space

246
Woodyz wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 9:08 am How does it define that a semaphore has stopped recalculating?
How about screen shooting a few of your next trade entries & exits with a) tick & comment...b) tick & comment....c) tick & comment. etc simply explaining what you're looking at / for and thinking for each step of your trading decisions using the Orbit.
No I am tired and I am NOT a trader to have that patience with traders. I said you see it when to enter and if you miss it you are only learning to remember it. There is an arrow combination follow it. The types of diagrams I would like to setup and talk about are not that simple at all. There are other things to say. When you can just follow. Any Orbit screen posted on this site go and look at it and see that each tells you what to do at the time they where taken. Use those for examples.

Cheers

(-_-)

Re: A New Trading Game (chaos game) Played for Money and Played in Risk- Free Space

247
saishala wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 9:09 am
Hey you said nothing. How you could have carefully planned to communicate and begin and end without doing so baffles me. No one can fail to communicate totally to others (because of the residuals we pick up), but you did (leaving out the residuals). I read this thing you wrote and my mouth hung (actually it is still hanging).

(-_-)

Re: A New Trading Game (chaos game) Played for Money and Played in Risk- Free Space

248
Darkdoji wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 9:39 am Hey you said nothing. How you could have carefully planned to communicate and begin and end without doing so baffles me. No one can fail to communicate totally to others (because of the residuals we pick up), but you did (leaving out the residuals). I read this thing you wrote and my mouth hung (actually it is still hanging).

(-_-)
I have not stopped communicating and I did not intend to leave residues. When I was told to lower my decibels by talking about other things (which I understand) I immediately became empty of almost all my previous comments. I think this is the right thing to do. If I were really someone who follows the path of the left hand, I would also have deleted the things that could help those who need it. For this reason, only what from my point of view could get in the way of the software was removed. Another thing is what I think or stop thinking that enters the private sphere of my own person. And I particularly believe I also have the right to think and reach conclusions that may be right or wrong and that as a man I will recognize both endings to myself.
That will never make anyone better or worse, it will only make one a human being.

Normally I forget many things but never the exit door and I always clean and order everything when I leave (otherwise my father or my mother or even my grandparents would beat me up)
From the domains of my desk and laptop Full of Porn and Charts I call upon the Spiritual Presence and Power of Richard Wyckoff, Jesse Livermore, George Soros and all the Wise in Volume and Standard Deviation to enlighten and make everyone get off their asses and go to study Market Structure, Liquidity Pools and Volume.

Selah

Re: A New Trading Game (chaos game) Played for Money and Played in Risk- Free Space

249
saishala wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 10:51 am I have not stopped communicating and I did not intend to leave residues. When I was told to lower my decibels by talking about other things (which I understand) I immediately became empty of almost all my previous comments. I think this is the right thing to do. If I were really someone who follows the path of the left hand, I would also have deleted the things that could help those who need it. For this reason, only what from my point of view could get in the way of the software was removed. Another thing is what I think or stop thinking that enters the private sphere of my own person. And I particularly believe I also have the right to think and reach conclusions that may be right or wrong and that as a man I will recognize both endings to myself.
That will never make anyone better or worse, it will only make one a human being.

Normally I forget many things but never the exit door and I always clean and order everything when I leave (otherwise my father or my mother or even my grandparents would beat me up)
I know but may be it is just me because again I fail to find meaning. You know in the traditional communication model you have encode then you transmit through medium and then you have decode with noise just before decode, etc is the same I used here but it seems the most loss occurs at encode such that there is for me nothing to decode. Even here I am completely blank.
The Crow (-_-)


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Applebot [Crawler], MarcoGee, Paddygir, SijjiN, waylon and 94 guests