Darkdoji wrote: Mon Dec 19, 2022 7:04 am
Let me just add that there is a lot to read and contemplate in order to understand what the tool is, what it does and how best to exploit it. No one teaches anyone or tries to explain to anyone how to use/understand the rsi to fit their individual imaginations of what a desirable rsi should look like and or how it should in fact behave (irrespective of our individual wants). We all study the rsi for how it is made and how it works and use it to the best of our abilities in the contexts we feel the rsi is best suited to. But realistically, if you do not understand the rsi for its properties as made there is hardly any sense in which it (the rsi) would be usefully explained to the individual. The fact remains that Orbit the Tool follows certain principles and unless one takes the pain to understand those and therefore the context of its application and utility in trading then it becomes difficult to the point of impossibility to understand it at all. For instance what the original poster wants is completely out of sync with the basis of the tool. The tool presents the market in the way mathematics models complex dynamical systems and unless that poster actually understands how mathematics models dynamical systems, to ask that the tool be made to behave exactly like the exponential moving average because that is the posters best sense of a useful tool in the context of trading, misses opportunities of further learning in how markets behave from the perspective of complex dynamical systems, and denies others interested in such a perspective the knowledge they seek. I am not sure that is a reasonable ask. A lot has been put out in forum that requires to be first reviewed and considered. I think those are things we want to deal with first and only when that is done might we be better placed to discuss the tool in particular contexts. This is especially so because the tool is not suggested as a "technical" indicator and we need therefore to understand the tool first for what it is and the only way is to follow through on the various printouts in forum plus other related information outwith forum relating to the tool and its context (chaos theory and fractal geometry). Once we gain such knowledge and understanding and query our understanding by asking questions in forum related to what we have read then we might make more headway in making suggestions based on our understanding of the tool and or subject field.
(-_-)
hello friend thanks for your attention....
I will follow your advice and test on m30, h1...
But I still repeat the tools are great and I'm very excited to study and put them into practice...
As I told you, I read the pdf several times and there are still many doubts about what is really important in this bunch of information....
1) What should we look at before making the decision to enter into an operation?
2) which indicators are the most important, and should they always be in symmetry?
I simply want to catch a strong trend, and follow it.... all the arrows show good security to know a direction... but there's still a lot of doubt, a lot of information... I'll keep reading the pdfs...
*************BUT if you could do me a great favor and put prints indicating what you should look at, what should be in symmetry .... if you could give some examples (entry exemples with photos or videos) with videos or just mt4 prints showing what you write it would be something wonderful and much clearer... thanks bro