Thank you. I conditionally use "prehistoric versions" - until 2020 (even systems found in 2016).
I don't quite see how the triangles improve trading at all.
its just visual represation of second dotjosi wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:58 pmI don't quite see how the triangles improve trading at all.
What can you achieve with the triangles that you could not without them?
Once you have the turning points you just follow the dots:
After a blue turning point: directional bias up - you follow the green dots (higher lows)
After a red turning point: directional bias down - you follow the red dots (lower highs)
That's clear enough but doesn't answer the question: does it improve trading?
Fast - very fast analysis.josi wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:58 pmI don't quite see how the triangles improve trading at all.
What can you achieve with the triangles that you could not without them?
Once you have the turning points you just follow the dots:
- After a blue turning point: directional bias up - you follow the green dots (higher lows)
Do we need 3 MAs? Some will, some won't (visualisation of higher TFs)
- After a red turning point: directional bias down - you follow the red dots (lower highs)
People don't always think about their setup enough - see: VQ (as of now): it just is a second representation of the MAs that are already on the screen; so it isn't - as some claim - confluence - as the mathematical approach is the same in both cases: so no extra information can be gathered).
XARD: Think of the Triangles as visual training wheels for those still trying to grasp the 2nd Dot theory. The Triangles and the third MA can be switched off from withing the input menu.
I didn't mean to criticize - just wanted to ask politely...
by Jagel, Mon Dec 07, 2020 10:37 am in Coding Help
by mlawson71, Tue Jan 12, 2021 3:56 am in Broker Talk
Users viewing this forum: Argos, CommonCrawl [Bot], DVanAssen, IBM oBot [Bot], kimhyunmin, kodisfx, kue92, SEMrush [Bot], Tbot [Bot] and 22 guests
