plissken wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2019 2:53 am 51YlwNNjStL._SX300_QL70_.jpg

Forget it ^^

Pacois the latest version of your indicator is up to date? or are you still going to improve it?

The strange fact that I'm not trying the indicator at all, so I don't even know what improvements it can make, it's good and bad when you know how to modify indicators, because it makes you distract from the market, for a while I want to concentrate on my tests -

the broker settled on 3 minimum minutes alone, and the test is invalidated.

signal:Range
Open- tma   Central High_Low
win95 High_Low
ema 1>20 High_Low

you have a great indicator and you do not use it,

I would like to delete the arrows that are inside the band I can see more clearly and I can focus on the supports and resistance quickly


I have too much noise in my chart is not clear, but version 4 has already good results

plissken wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2019 3:29 am you have a great indicator and you do not use it,

I would like to delete the arrows that are inside the band I can see more clearly and I can focus on the supports and resistance quickly


I have too much noise in my chart is not clear, but version 4 has already good results

I have changed many indicators for myself, I have created an all-automatic system for testing, without my intervention, to avoid sticking too many hours in front of the monitor, and to reset the emotional factor, but so far only lost time, there are people who they are better than me, who make profits. without knowing anything about code.

Hi plissken
Which indicator did you use with 5 ITM?

Design an automated indicator, you have to check the itm rate over the length in several weeks is long and nothing guarantees the success you can not automated the last indicator and put additional conditions in the programming for success?

plissken wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2019 3:42 am Design an automated indicator, you have to check the itm rate over the length in several weeks is long and nothing guarantees the success you can not automated the last indicator and put additional conditions in the programming for success?

sorry I did not understand

sorry
I meant can you design, with your new indicator, turn it into an automatic system but ... you have to improve the indicator

plissken wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2019 3:51 am sorry
I meant can you design, with your new indicator, turn it into an automatic system but ... you have to improve the indicator

yes, but you tell me the name of the indicator, I got lost ..

ha ^^

custom2Indicator 2_ tma_true

plissken wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2019 4:00 am ha ^^

custom2Indicator 2_ tma_true

do you want changes on this indicator?