Really interesting stuff!

It certainly makes sense.
But each broker does not give 99% quality of the historical data. In this case, where do we get the quality historical data for a min. one-year backtests?

Hello,
It depends on the person probably, but which source do you think provides the best quality data?
Which one do you recommend?

Dukascopy or Alpari?

mladen wrote: Sat May 06, 2017 2:53 am That would be OK

I am happy when I hear you approve of some ideas :P
Thank you for all your thoughts.

mladen wrote: Fri May 05, 2017 5:18 pm Frankly, it depends on the time frame
That would be good for 1 hour charts, but would be too short for weekly charts.

mladen,
Ea works on M15.
9 months optimization procedure for M15 is too long and unnecessary?
Or not?

Hi, I always wondered the answer to this question. I decided to do a simple test of my curiosity! For this I set up the same EA for two different PCs that will work on the demo and real account of the same brokers and see the results. - I made all the settings of EA on both accounts the same. - I ha...

There is no such thing as ideal period, but for sure don't use to short period (that is, by definition, just a noise) or too long period (that would fall into over-fitting definition) Hello mladen. Thank you for sharing your ideas. In this case, it seems logical to optimize EA in the "last 6 -...

Hello to everyone. I'll ask a simple question. Please share your thoughts. How long should the average be preferred when optimizing any EA in MT4? Some people say 1 year, some say 3 months will be enough. These very different time periods confuse my head! :? Briefly, what is the ideal or generally a...

Ok.
Thank you for your interest.

Is there a way to fix the this error in the code?