Stochastic shows same thing than ZigZag, so maybe better to use that because we can see history, we cannot see history in ZigZag. As we want to see Vibration in M15, I think we should have Stoch setting 15-1-1 Close/Close, and because we are only looking buy signals, because we are above that Low En...

Cladi39 wrote: Sat Jan 05, 2019 6:27 am

Thanks for your help, Can i ask you last question? In what conssist the repaint? the dots can desapear in current candle? in the history? My interest is when candle close.

There is a option to show in first candle, maybe safer to have that False.

This is Fibonacci channel, I put those 3 points in close, was thinking that maybe wicks are noise. I don`t really know, just a thought.

pacois wrote: Sat Jan 05, 2019 6:08 am

vibration could be the zig zag wide highs and lows

Yes, like they say: ZigZag is price without noise.
I was just thinking that maybe some dynamic Fibonacci indicator could show us vibration, because Fibonacci is in nature and so on, but that ZigZag is maybe better. Have to think about that.

So, we add Bollinger Bands 30 2.6 and we look what it shows us. First there was that Low Energy rectangle, price goes above it and comes later back to that level where that last push Started. And what we see, price goes outside the Channel and Activity is High. Now we need one more thing, Vibration,...

John Bollinger said that when you have 30 units and deviation is 2.6, then price stays inside the Channel 99% of the time. This is XAUUSD M15 few days ago, 100 candles and 1 time price closes outside the channel. So I think we can call that Frequency. Charts are sending information to us in that Fre...

Here is that VSA signal, No Supply there where it should be.

In fact, where you see a lack of energy the amplitude is high, so actually the energy is high as well at this point. If there were a follow-through it would be an heavy interference. A lack of interference would be the right term. Noup. maybe you have heard that there is trading strategy called Vol...

moey_dw wrote: Fri Jan 04, 2019 7:54 pm

can u show us pls it is nice to learn what u are saying especially for not so experience peoples!

So these are 2 different timeframes, M1 and H4. You cannot see difference. A chart is a chart is a chart.

viewtopic.php?p=1295376859#p1295376859

A downtrend!!! What about the big timeframes............ :think: I do believe that chart is a chart is a chart, and I can prove that too. But let`s forget that now, I do believe that we should see same things in every timeframe and every chart. Post another chart Moye if you have some chart, that y...