John Ehlers has revealed a secret in his new article. Can you show us what he said?
Something about pink noise. I don't understand anything about it. Are mathematicians trying to trick little hamsters again? post1295561763.html#p1295561763
Re: Paid non-repainting trading systems
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2025 8:28 am
by guner
andrei-1 wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:55 am
John Ehlers has revealed a secret in his new article. Can you show us what he said?
Something about pink noise. I don't understand anything about it. Are mathematicians trying to trick little hamsters again? post1295561763.html#p1295561763
sin(i/x1)
sin(i/x2)
sin(i/x3)
depend time and bar numbers..
does not match the prices..
I thought he advised us to buy a large monitor and look at all timeframes at once.
But he advised eating sin(i/x1) sin(i/x2) sin(i/x3). Then I do not know.
Re: Paid non-repainting trading systems
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2025 11:58 am
by Errør314159
This is probably the only thing close to perfect tops and bottoms
Time cycles and sentiments alone are meh
Seen people get good results from this but i think its only futures or whatever has order flow data stuff