Page 11 of 19

Re: Is this setup valuable?

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 12:49 am
by updowncrude
For your kind information,Except the SR, No repainting indicators is used.
Check .

Re: Is this setup valuable?

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 1:09 am
by Cagliostro
updowncrude wrote: Fri Jun 20, 2025 12:49 am For your kind information,Except the SR, No repainting indicators is used.
Check .Screenshot 2025-06-19 201644.png
If you don't explain your strategy/ indicators, what is the goal of showing charts with arrows ?
Do you want to show-off or what?

Re: Is this setup valuable?

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 1:34 am
by updowncrude
You are correct, but this helps me to keep records.

Once this setup makes valuable contribution,without asking I will post.
I just started this MT5 thread yesterday,
Need some time to analyse 2/3 indicators I have created through AI,
combinations and confluences matters,which you know as an MT5 expert.

Adaptive swing is the only indicator developed,
other indicators available in codebase.

If you need it, I can post without testing.

Thank you.

Re: Is this setup valuable?

Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 8:01 pm
by updowncrude
Swing bars signals filtered by RSI

Re: Is this setup valuable?

Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 9:59 pm
by Cagliostro
updowncrude wrote: Thu Jul 03, 2025 8:01 pm Swing bars signals filtered by RSI
Screenshot 2025-07-03 152909.png
Not using any liquidity levels?

Re: Is this setup valuable?

Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 11:14 pm
by updowncrude
continuation


closing the positions

Re: Is this setup valuable?

Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 11:17 pm
by updowncrude
Cagliostro wrote: Thu Jul 03, 2025 9:59 pm Not using any liquidity levels?
just using the indicator swing bars +RSI validation

Re: Is this setup valuable?

Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 11:28 pm
by Cagliostro
updowncrude wrote: Thu Jul 03, 2025 11:17 pm just using the indicator swing bars +RSI validation
if it does not repaint it could be interesting in taking a look at the logic to see if it can be useful to improve zigzag.

Re: Is this setup valuable?

Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 1:01 am
by updowncrude
Cagliostro wrote: Thu Jul 03, 2025 11:28 pm if it does not repaint it could be interesting in taking a look at the logic to see if it can be useful to improve zigzag.
zigzag is not used,
It is a simple indicator lookback swing bars and RSI threshold,
parameters attached.
Just two signals traded
Deepseek says it is a non repainting indicator with RSI filter.
Indicator Overview
This indicator combines swing point detection with RSI confirmation to generate trading signals:

Identifies swing highs/lows using a lookback period (default 5 bars)

Confirms signals with RSI (default period 14)

Uses a 50-level threshold for both buy (RSI <50) and sell (RSI >50) signals

Claims to be non-repainting through confirmed signal buffers 1

Strengths for H1 Trading
Non-Repainting Nature: The indicator stores confirmed signals in separate buffers (ConfirmedBuyBuffer/ConfirmedSellBuffer), which suggests signals won't disappear after formation 1. This is crucial for reliable trading.

Combined Approach: Using both price action (swings) and momentum (RSI) provides better confirmation than either method alone 58.

Alert System: The built-in alert functionality can be valuable for H1 trading where constant chart monitoring isn't practical.

Customizable Parameters: You can adjust the lookback period and RSI settings to suit different market conditions 8.

Potential Limitations
RSI Threshold: Using 50 as both buy and sell thresholds may generate many signals in ranging markets but could miss strong trends where RSI stays above/below 50 for extended periods 7.

Swing Sensitivity: A 5-bar lookback on H1 may be too sensitive, potentially generating many false signals in choppy markets 1.

Lack of Trend Filter: The indicator doesn't incorporate any trend identification, which could lead to counter-trend trades in strong trending markets 8.

No Risk Management: The indicator provides entry signals but doesn't suggest stop loss or take profit levels 5.

Recommendations for Live Trading
Thorough Backtesting: Before going live, backtest extensively on H1 charts across different currency pairs and market conditions 8.

Parameter Optimization: Consider adjusting:

Increase lookback period to 10-20 bars for H1 timeframe

Use traditional RSI thresholds (70/30) or adjust to 60/40 for stronger confirmation 8

Test different RSI periods (9 for more sensitivity, 21 for smoother signals) 8

Add Complementary Filters:

Incorporate a trend filter (e.g., price above/below 200 MA) 8

Add volume confirmation if trading liquid instruments 8

Use support/resistance levels to filter signals 5

Risk Management: Always use stop losses (consider 2% rule mentioned in search results) 8 and proper position sizing.

Start Small: Begin with small live positions to verify real-market performance before committing significant capital.

Re: Is this setup valuable?

Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 4:51 am
by Eis
Definitely a scam
There is nothing about counting bars
Or a 50 level cross
That suggests the perfect top or bottom
Delusional thinking

Only breakouts or retests are reliable
Maybe divergences with good risk ratio
Or here 👇
Errør314159 wrote: Sun Mar 23, 2025 4:26 pm Another good overbought oversold indicator 👍

For those looking around also see

Ascend Fractal Chart

Stdv Rsi Fvg

Trix Divergence

Tma Cg nrp

(Price Action / ObOs / Trend / Entry)
Or play around with solar wind code and you can get some decent signals 65% non repaint which is basically the same as any other oscillator
That good ole snake oil 👌