Chrisstoff wrote: Fri Jan 25, 2019 7:00 am
Thank you for the info, I do appreciate your work with the tests and your response. Looking at the image of your AUDCAD test, it did not really survive, or if still, then there was a significant loss at the end.
This closing is compulsory, as there were no further quotes, so the drawdown at the time was quite large, more than half the depot, but perhaps the test would have been successful, just the pair was not optimized and worked without a stop, only provided the correct vision of the situation, which is simple the tester in MT4 does not give the correct picture of testing and it would be a mistake to rely on its results, even TDS with a quality of 99% will not guarantee that everything will be perfect in reality, after optimization and running in TDS I use a bunch of other programs to analyze the floor It’s the hardest way to achieve a good set of files. In general, 99% gives us a vision that the owl is working and there is a certain potential, but everything else is in our hands, perhaps there is not enough opening by session time, filter by weekday, candle size filter, here the analyst’s work begins tell the coder what you need to add or remove from the advisor and then again everything is in a circle, so thanks to Mrtools for giving us reason for thinking and acting))))))))