mrtools wrote: Sun Jan 24, 2021 1:04 pm
Try it out. Updated the code a little bit also.

Thanks MrTools. Looks great, testing just became much easier.

DrNefario wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 12:06 am
Thanks MrTools. Looks great, testing just became much easier.

Thanks!
Looks really interesting! Let's see how it'll work under market conditions.

mrtools wrote: Sun Jan 24, 2021 1:04 pm

Try it out. Updated the code a little bit also.

MrTools, there seems to be a problem with the on chart arrows when loading more than one instance of the indicator with diferent settings.
Instead of loading the arrows from both indicators at the same time, it only shows those that belong to the last instance of the indicator.
Would you mind looking into it?

DrNefario wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 7:33 am

MrTools, there seems to be a problem with the on chart arrows when loading more than one instance of the indicator with diferent settings.
Instead of loading the arrows from both indicators at the same time, it only shows those that belong to the last instance of the indicator.
Would you mind looking into it?

Each instance of the indicator will need a different arrows ID.

mrtools wrote: Sun Jan 24, 2021 1:04 pm Try it out. Updated the code a little bit also.

how this ha delta calculate from normal ha???

moey_dw wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:35 pm
how this ha delta calculate from normal ha???

Mo, it's calculated by subtracting HA Open from HA Close. So most of the time it actually predicts trend changes several candles in advance

Jimmy wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:37 pm

Mo, it's calculated by subtracting HA Open from HA Close. So most of the time it actually predicts trend changes several candles in advance

kk thx jimmyboy

josi wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:20 am
Looks really interesting! Let's see how it'll work under market conditions.

Compare the 2 screenshots - they should tell you which of the 2 is more reliable.
It's the signal line that creates the problem.

josi wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 8:38 pm
Compare the 2 screenshots - they should tell you which of the 2 is more reliable.
It's the signal line that creates the problem.

I think I liked more the settings you used on your other screenshot for the slower HAdelta... 20,12 instead of 16,16. It has pretty much the same Zero level crosses as the relative strength rank with 20,40 settings, albeit just a little faster.
Eitherway, you're not forced to use the signal line, we could just change the color to "none".

DrNefario wrote: Tue Jan 26, 2021 6:44 am I think I liked more the settings you used on your other screenshot for the slower HAdelta... 20,12 instead of 16,16. It has pretty much the same Zero level crosses as the relative strength rank with 20,40 settings, albeit just a little faster.
Eitherway, you're not forced to use the signal line, we could just change the color to "none".

Thanks for your answer & suggestions. The only reason I changed it is the earlier signal (and it's hard to see real drawdowns).
If you look at GE30 H1 (or UK100) this morning when could you have entered the upward move that finished the W-formation.
Nevertheless, I will look into it over the weekend. Hope to hear more from you.