ionone wrote: Mon Dec 23, 2024 9:06 pm why couldn't you fix the repainting issue first, for an indi that "doesn't repaint" it repaints pretty badly

// Main Fisher Transform Loop
for(i_ = limit - 1; i_ >= 1; i_--)
{
   MaxH = High[Highest(NULL, 0, MODE_HIGH, period, i_)];
   MinL = Low[Lowest(NULL, 0, MODE_LOW, period, i_)];
   ...
   mainFisherCalc0[i_] = ... // Calculation
   ...
}

Cagliostro wrote: Mon Dec 23, 2024 10:20 pm The MTF component will repaint in any case, it is how MTF works.

Is the rest repainting, sure?

Find something in the code below that enables repainting please.

Code: Select all

// Main Fisher Transform Loop
for(i_ = limit - 1; i_ >= 1; i_--)
{
   MaxH = High[Highest(NULL, 0, MODE_HIGH, period, i_)];
   MinL = Low[Lowest(NULL, 0, MODE_LOW, period, i_)];
   ...
   mainFisherCalc0[i_] = ... // Calculation
   ...
}

Doing calculations from the newest bar (limit - 1) down to the oldest (i_ >= 1) prevents “forward-looking” changes to already-closed bars. Once bar i_ is processed, its values are fixed and do not change afterward.

PS: none is forcing you to use it, there are 100.000 indicators around to test. Nothing personal, but your attitude is not the best.

ionone wrote: Mon Dec 23, 2024 11:57 pm once again : play your indicator in the strategy tester, for a few bars, and then put the indicator a second time on the chart
both signals should be identical if they don't repaint.
here is what your indicator outputs :
TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT THINGS
screenshot.743.jpg
and this is without any MTF

Cagliostro wrote: Tue Dec 24, 2024 12:18 am This is my tester, with an additional indicator on top. Stop using different settings and wasting my time. As said go and find something else to use.
Discussion is over.

image_2024-12-23_141534799.png

Tradehunter wrote: Tue Dec 24, 2024 12:01 am Why not ask kvak or Mr. Tools to take a look at the code?
I'm sure they would help you seeing as how you are making an attempt to contribute, which is great.
But this is a game of money, and people are putting it on the line based on something that doesn't work. That's not great

Cagliostro wrote: Mon Dec 23, 2024 10:20 pm

ionone wrote: Tue Dec 24, 2024 12:57 am Listen carefully
this will be the last attempt to communicate with you.

1) you made a mistake, and you posted a shitty "improved" Solar Winds (very repainting) while you meant to post the real indicator that you made and we'll forgive you if you recognize your mistake

OR

2) you intentionally are trying to discredit the reputation of this forum by posting crappy indicator that repaint badly as the real deal and as a very professionnal looking indicator (so pro that Jimmy posted it on social platforms like Facebook)

your turn
screenshot.744.jpg

Cagliostro wrote: Tue Dec 24, 2024 2:16 am