You have read extensively here (especially very recently), from people who actually have no clue about my intentions that I am some kind of fraud seeking to scam traders for gain and they have predicated those awful assertions on the colour of my skin and the country that I come from (which I love more than any other in the world). It is a clever appeal to the majority of members and of course visitors who happen to be the same colour as them. But it is far from the truth and I show you proof in the two publications I attach here.

My intention is very simple and that is to displace among traders and analysts for always the notion of “technical” analysis and “fundamental” analysis as valid tools for trading markets profitably or indeed at all. My motivations can be found simply in Plato’s Pythagoras and Meno. I seek to establish my legacy by significant work in a matter that will change and improve many lives everywhere.
Whether I succeed immediately or later is not important but that I am allowed to circulate my views freely and without harassment based on falsehoods and and for which my detractors appear to be getting away with simply because they know this sort of mentally is pervasive in their countries and among their peoples. Otherwise they have no credibility at all. Yet it is for all people that I hope in the end I do deliver some good.

I know that I alone may not deliver my powerful ideas and when I came I approached “systems” proponents on this site offering to collaborate with them and share my ideas. @meyney for instance has not replied to my last PM and @XARD not only ignored my PM to date but provided a false list to some mathematician in an attempt to discredit me even when in fact he was and is still profoundly ignorant about my methods and the utility of same. I think he sees me as some kind of competition but as you can see below I am nothing like that just a guy that made a massive discovery and wanted to share for everyone’s good and so I gave up on that group.

So now the truth depends on you good people. It is for your good that I do what I do and you will find a) that it is in fact ignorant to demand proof of my claims before adopting my ideas and employing them yourself to empirically prove. As I am selling nothing to anyone so b) it is a question of evaluating the ideas I have come with to determine your take. c) Further, and in my newest publication I show mathematical proof of the idea and in a sense everyone can relate to. So there is objective evidence and because my model is empirically derived it is not just difficult to discredit but the procedure for discrediting it requires empirical proof. So my appeal to those neutrals out there that are traders is that you give yourself a chance a) read both books and keep them for reference b) where you are convinced enough to adopt the ideas do test them for yourself to see the veracity in practice and by yourself. c) Also dwell on the mathematical basis to see that in fact there is no need to doubt just based on the math alone. I have described the math in such a way that knowing math at all is not required and in fact any trader at all including newbies can follow the logic and decide very easily where the truth lies. I wish everyone the best and good luck.

The Crow (_-_) Inverted: Is simply a Solutionist and nothing more