In a few days I am going to teach a lesson (and I mean teach a lesson). A practical lesson and begin to show the real difference between a chaotic model of the market and a “system” any “system” at all. I am going to show that chaos affects traders mentally and that this correlates with entry points (Initial Conditions and particularly intermittency), these are the points in time when trades are won, lost, or missed – Initial Conditions is also known as “the butterfly effect” or simply chaos. Without taking any statistics most traders are too scared to actually trade on any day. Most are just talking, no one is making an active living and going big time from trading - NONE.

ONLY A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF THE MARKET CAN BREAK THAT cycle.

So it is not about signals NO. It is about control only a model provides control and only a model can be depended on to deliver control 100/100 entries (this is the critical measure of a model).

THAT IS the DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF THE MARKET AND A “system.” IN A FEW DAYS. This will help us understand what something that is NOT a trading “system” is doing in the trading “systems” forum even if it is actually an Iterated Functions System of the Market. I will show you how to enter Orbit, as many time as you choose and in a way that no “system” in the world (that is not automated), can show you NONE. In a matter of DAYS.
Meantime trading Gold and saw Command 0 trigger: First slide is the command 0 Version Orbit specially made for entry and testing for the everybody crowd as you read this. Second slide my screen (on mine there is an added structure to time the next bar out in reverse --do not forget we are in FLE). A Model is NOT a trading “system” and it is about CONTROL not “signals”.

(_-_)

PS: Everything in the diagram can be justified before even academic mathematics and no questions.