[1] Top right first slide you can see how well in the money we are.

[2] On the same slide you can see the point to point moves earlier.

[3] I traded each for a 3/3. Could have entered the 2(Y) at the right hand edge Tokyo. But was tired and never want to tempt a good thing so let it ride.
[4] This morning woke late so read market late but read correctly we still had at worst a little more to do going down (besides there was a lot of unbalance between pivots across the various partitions (unbalance = pivots nested at the wrong weights which is a give away notified by the Cloud Version but not the prototype), so entered to at worst a H4 Y(2).
[5] but before we had that point to point translation Screenface showed we may be going further in space (Global Inverse On - 6n Fractal Patterns came on)
[6] So I scaled in to increase my potential profit in direction. I set stop to Breakeven and increased range by 3000 points. So the only thing I can lose now (which is a real loss and painful but unavoidable), is the time value of capital employed but not the capital itself as actually if we make my speculative target it will be a killing. This is how I have benefited from point to point trading (deterministic trading), and using the trading apparatus Orbit the Tool. And feel good because risk is well managed and potential for profits remains high even in the situation (not nice), of entering at well less than Initial Value (Semaphore), for this run which is the safest practice. Which means in Orbit WAIT FOR A PIVOT YOUR EYES CAN SEE TO ENTER TRADE (i.e. to begin trade planing). If there is none immediately then another time ---> the market is not running away. The idea from "technical" trading of setting daily targets forcing traders to take risky trades in order to meet up is not very sophisticated and stems from fear and the difficulty of winning "technical" trades. When you trade chaos we show you that you trade non risky space between 2 points and opportunities of that are many so you can be patient. Since most trades are sure, time losses (they are real economic losses however), on the time value of money are highly conservative and minimised compared with trading by "technical" analysis which has an objectionable level of the prevalence of and tolerance for extremely high loss rates in their so-called "systems" (though that now can be corrected by trading System + OTT).

(_-_) Inverted

BTW: We are torturing (finding the deformation rate of), @Chikenspicy's indictor until it confesses its secrets and that way allow us to see a fit in chaotic space. Good so far but incredible lag means we still need to torture it some more to gain the fit in timing we need.