Darkdoji wrote: Sun Mar 26, 2023 10:28 pm With respect to what I am saying here viewtopic.php?p=1295507593#p1295507593 below is the graphical expression of the same meaning. It is the math you keep in mind first and your experience is second. Your experience is from the behaviour of the screenface per move and is useful. But no 2 sequences or cycles is the same in chaos EVER so it is difficult to the point of impossibility to find an exact screenface sequence that will assure your fear of risk. The math says on Inverse a trade is zero risk. Take advantage of that. So place your confidence in the quality of the mathematics which we have shown you in formal math text (it is not me that said so it is mathematics that says a bijection has continuous inverse on). Your experience will bear this out each time. In "technical" analysis there is no such quality so the trader tries to guess the best combination of indicators that guaranties "high probability" trades (but note ultimately this is negated by the fact that in a chaotic system no 2 cycles are the same EVER). But Inverse On = the highest probability trade and is and of itself the only sure indication you can get. Of course being human one would want something "concrete" to assure him or her he is on the right track so it is fine to use snaps to try to identify such for yourself and generally just for psychological reasons but the quality is in math not what you try to work out since that can fail. But if you understand the math in slide 1 for instance you know that a certain function must fluctuate uncertainly in order to repeatedly fold since the system (market), must repeatedly fold to stretch. That does not imply risk but an inductive process that in the end follows through accordingly. It is simple is NOT a lack of quality it is because of the absolute certainty of the quality of the MATH - it is absolute and hence a deterministic system admits no randomness in its future states exactly as you see in Orbit.

(-_-)