crvic wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:57 pm
Guys, a question, when you operate on the 1-minute timeframe, which moving average is the most suitable for knowing the trend at that time frame? EMA 200 seems to delay the perception of a trend change too much... Or is it really the most appropriate? I'm trying to adapt to these smaller graphic times...
Thanks again very much!
If you really want to trade the 1 minute timeframe's "trend" you'll need a laggy moving average to help filter out the noise
- Longer moving averages suit smaller timeframes ie. 100 EMA & 200 EMA (more drawn out to cushion noise)
- Shorter moving averages suit higher timeframes ie. 13 EMA & 34 EMA (faster reacting)
Shorter moving averages suit higher timeframes like the 4 hour and Daily as those charts have already filtered out most of the noise and will give you better signals even when using a less laggy moving average setting.
This is why technical indicators always look best on the Daily, Weekly (and above) charts because price movement is way more accurate on those big timeframes.
The lower the timeframe, the less accurate representation of the market it is. It's just a fact.
PS: One of the most laggy but accurate moving average indicators for lower timeframe trading is the
ADXvma. Try it on the 1 minute chart using the default settings. If you need to increase the periods it's good practice to use
Fibonacci numbers for your inputs ie. 13, 21, 34, 55, 89 etc.